:Notes of the conveyance of the language of the legal-fiction-entities for the evaluation of the meaning:

:Motion for a Continuance:

HAWAII REVISED STATUTES TITLE 32
COURTS AND COURT OFFICERS
CHAPTER 603
CIRCUIT COURTS
603-16 CONTINUANCE OF HEARING OR TRIAL

If the judge of any circuit court, or any other circuit judge authorized to preside in the circuit, fails to attend any trial or hearing at the time appointed, a clerk thereof shall continue any case or matter then before the court for trial or hearing, from time to time, until the attendance of one of the circuit judges; but no such continuance shall be for a longer period than seven days, except as otherwise ordered by the court.

:Causes for a Continuance:

For the first-time: acting as an attorney-in-fact, pro-se or otherwise: navigating as the captain of a charter-vessel with the waters of the Maritime-Law with a legal-fiction: CIRCUIT COURT is with the need for the time, for the safety of all vessels, for the study of the words, terms and structure of the conveyance of the language, for the comprehension, and evaluation of the law by the captain.

For the lack of the ease and safety of the navigability of the waters is with the fact of the crowding of the forty-prisoners with one room with the lack of any toilet or water with the Secure-Party for the time of the kidnapping of the Secure-Party as a surety for the GLEN M. SWARTWOUT as a violation of the Security-Agreements: GMS041175SA and GMS032574SA with the registration with the corporation: STATE OF HAWAII by the UCC-1-Form of the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE of the STATE OF HAWAII.

For the lack of the ease and safety of the navigability of the waters is with the fact of the two-million: Americans as the prisoners of the war against the people with the claim by the Acts and Actions of the US of the year of Our Lord: MCMXXXIII by the fiction: US.

For the claim of the Continuance is for the time for the study and organization of the statements and business-matters of this case.

For the claim of the Continuance is for the time for the stopping and correcting of the wrongs with the F.R.C.P. §1986.

:F.R.C.P. = Federal-Rules-of-Civil-Procedure

Judicial official shall consider the following when deciding whether to grant or deny a motion for continuance:
·the age of the case;
·the status of the trial calendar for the week;
·the order in which the case appears on the trial calendar, including whether the case is peremptorily scheduled;
·the number of previous continuances;
·the extent to which counsel had input into the scheduling of the trial date;
·the due diligence of counsel in promptly filing a motion for continuance as soon as
practicable;
·whether the reason for continuance is a short lived event which could resolve prior to the scheduled trial date;
·the length of the continuance requested, if applicable;
·the position of opposing counsel;
·whether the parties themselves consent to the continuance;
·present or future inconvenience or unavailability of witnesses/parties; and
·any other matter that promotes the ends of justice.
Reasons that shall not be considered valid bases for allowing a continuance motion include first time scheduling of the case for trial, potential conflicting scheduling of other trials in other courts and whether counsel of record has received payment.

:Source: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

For this case is with the lack of any prior-Continuance.

For this Claim is with the prompt-filing with the state with the day of the Lord of the practicability.

For the lack of the knowledge of the private-copyright: Law of the legal-fiction-corporation: STATE OF HAWAII is: now with the process of the correction with the study by the Secure-Party.

Rule 48 . DISMISSAL.
(a) By Prosecutor. The prosecutor may by leave of court file a dismissal of a charge and the prosecution shall thereupon terminate. Such a dismissal may not be filed during the trial without the consent of the defendant.
(b) By Court. Except in the case of traffic offenses that are not punishable by imprisonment, the court shall, on motion of the defendant, dismiss the charge, with or without prejudice in its discretion, if trial is not commenced within 6 months:
(1) from the date of arrest if bail is set or from the filing of the charge, whichever is sooner, on any offense based on the same conduct or arising from the same criminal episode for which the arrest or charge was made; or
(2) from the date of re-arrest or re-filing of the charge, in cases where an initial charge was dismissed upon motion of the defendant; or
(3) from the date of mistrial, order granting a new trial or remand, in cases where such events require a new trial.
Clauses (b)(1) and (b)(2) shall not be applicable to any offense for which the arrest was made or the charge was filed prior to the effective date of the rule.
(c) Excluded Periods. The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time for trial commencement:
(1) periods that delay the commencement of trial and are caused by collateral or other proceedings concerning the defendant, including but not limited to penal irresponsibility examinations and periods during which the defendant is incompetent to stand trial, pretrial motions, interlocutory appeals and trials of other charges;
(2) periods that delay the commencement of trial and are caused by congestion of the trial docket when the congestion is attributable to exceptional circumstances;
(3) periods that delay the commencement of trial and are caused by a continuance granted at the request or with the consent of the defendant or defendant's counsel;
(4) periods that delay the commencement of trial and are caused by a continuance granted at the request of the prosecutor if:
(i) the continuance is granted because of the unavailability of evidence material to the prosecution's case, when the prosecutor has exercised due diligence to obtain such evidence and there are reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence will be available at a later date; or
(ii) the continuance is granted to allow the prosecutor additional time to prepare the prosecutor's case and additional time is justified because of the exceptional circumstances of the case;
(5) periods that delay the commencement of trial and are caused by the absence or unavailability of the defendant;
(6) the period between a dismissal of the charge by the prosecutor to the time of arrest or filing of a new charge, whichever is sooner, for the same offense, or an offense required to be joined with that offense;
(7) a reasonable period of delay when the defendant is joined for trial with a codefendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and there is good cause for not granting a severance; and
(8) other periods of delay for good cause.
(d) Per Se Excludable and Includable Periods of Time for Purposes of Subsection (c)(1) of this Rule.
(1) For purposes of subsection (c)(1) of this rule, the period of time, from the filing through the prompt disposition of the following motions filed by a defendant, shall be deemed to be periods of delay resulting from collateral or other proceedings concerning the defendant: motions to dismiss, to suppress, for voluntariness hearing heard before trial, to sever counts or defendants, for disqualification of the prosecutor, for withdrawal of counsel including the time period for appointment of new counsel if so ordered, for mental examination, to continue trial, for transfer to the circuit court, for remand from the circuit court, for change of venue, to secure the attendance of a witness by a material witness order, and to secure the attendance of a witness from without the state.
(2) For purposes of subsection (c)(1) of this rule, the period of time, from the filing through the prompt disposition of the following motions or court papers, shall be deemed not to be excluded in computing the time for trial commencement: notice of alibi, requests/motions for discovery, and motions in limine , for voluntariness bearing heard at trial, for bail reduction, for release pending trial, for bill of particulars, to strike surplusage from the charge, for return of property, for discovery sanctions, for litigation expenses and for depositions.
(3) The criteria provided in section (c) shall be applied to motions that are not listed in subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2) in determining whether the associated periods of time may be excluded in computing the time for trial commencement.

:Source:

For any claim of the vacating of the charges is with the power of the CIRCUIT COURT.

For a claim of the acceptance of the charges is with the power of the Secure-Party.

Is for the Defendant-property: GLEN M. SWARTWOUT as a legal-fiction with the lack of the competence for the standing with a trial?

Is for the word: Competence as a word of the English-language with the meaning: ?

Communicative competence is a term from linguistics. Broadly conceived, linguistics is the study of human language and a linguist is someone who engages in this study. The study of linguistics can be conceived as occuring along three major axes, the endpoints of which are:

Synchronic and diachronic: Synchronic study of a language is concerned only with the language as it is at a given time; diachronic study is concerned with the history of a language or group of languages, and what structural changes have occurred. It is the ability to not only apply the grammatical rules of a language in order to form grammatically correct sentences but also to know when and where to use these sentences and to whom. (Definition by the Dictionary of Teaching and Applied Linguistics.)

There are four aspects to communicative competence:
grammatical competence: words and rules
sociolinguistic competence: appropriateness
discourse competence: coherence
strategic competence: stategies when communication starts to fail such as moving on to something else

In the last 20 years, what has emerged from applied linguistics is that the goal of second language teaching should be communicative competence. This is in contrast to previous standards where grammatical competence was the priority. Recognition that successful communication includes more than constructing grammatical correct utterances has been influenced by the field of pragmatics

Pragmatics is a subfield of linguistics. It is the study of how context influences the interpretation of meaning. Context here must be interpreted as situation as it may include any imaginable extralinguistic factor.

:Source:

With this seal in this ~MM: Jubilee-Year of our Lord with his age: IV-years:
For this Ambassador: Glen-Martin: Samaritan of the Troy is founder of this Christicelli/Christiasselli-Claim of this Catholic-Christian-Church-Community
as many living-cells in one body of our Brother, Redeemer, Lord and Saviour: Jesus: Christ: King of all Kings in this Kingdom of this Heaven by the Unity of the Trinity.

:::Thy will be done on Earth, As, It is in Heaven.:::

::::locus-sigilli::::

:::omega:::