:Law:

:::alpha:::

:::Banner of the Sacre-Coeur
of our Brother: King
of these Kings in his Kingdom
on his Earth in his Heavens,
as our Judge & Redeemer:::

:::Our Father,
who art in Heaven,
Holy be thy name:
Thy Kingdom Come:::

:Courtroom:

:::sophia:::

:::Stamp against all evil
by our Virgin-Mother: Queen,
Coredemptrix and
Mediatrix of all Graces,
as our Counselor & Advocate:::

For a court of the law is a room with the construction in the image of a box. For the rules of boxing are for the separation of the box against the space of the surround. For the truth of the court is with the joinder with the land of the real and true.

For the word: court in the Bible is with the correspondence with the Hebrew: haçer with the meaning: enclosed space. For the lack of the closure is with the proof by the entry of the door, bar or box. For the truth of all space is with the openness to the eyes of our Lord.

For the box of the jury is for the separation of any jury as a side-show with the control of the vision, hearing and knowledge of the jury by the judge.

For the benches of the judge and deputy are as the benches of a river for the control of the flow of the currency.

For the bar of the court is for the separation of the audience and actors of the play. For the similarity is with the communion-railing of the Church for the watching and participating in the Sacrifice of the Masses. For the entry of the bar is as the entry of the sanctuary of the Law. For the Court and Church are with the Greatness of the size of their halls for the shock (court) and awe (church), with the meaning in the German as the Blitzkrieg.

For the stands of the clerk and witness are for the standing in the court of the truth of the flesh and blood of the live-witness and live-clerk/judge. For the documents and certification of the questions, statements, claims and actions in the court are with the Clerk as the Judge.

Are all laws referenced directly and indirectly to your oath of office operational and upheld in this court by your honor?

Yes: So, you operate under the full hierarch of the law upon which your oath of office is founded and you are sworn to uphold: The Constitution which is founded on the higher laws of Nature and Nature's God (in my faith this must include the New Covenant law of love of God, neighbor and enemy alike, plus supportive Ecclesiastical and Common law) and the Law of Nations?

Can you show evidence that the Constitution of the united States of America was properly ratified by We the People?

AMENDMENT VII.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

No: Which of these Laws do you fail to uphold? Natural Law? God's Law? New Covenant? Ecclesiastical Law? Common Law?

(A servant cannot be greater than his master. A creation cannot be greater than its creator.)

(I see a graven image of the pantheistic Roman deity: Lady Justice in this house. This faith is not my faith, so I am strictly forbidden against any participation in the services of other faiths by my Lord.)

If you are arrested and go into court, you have to understand the law for a criminal action, or it is a reversible error for the court to try you. If you don't understand the law, they can't try you. (5 UCC Y3-415).

"Accommodation Party." One who signs commercial paper in any capacity for the purpose of lending his name to another party on an instrument. Such a party is a surety: "One who undertakes to pay money or do other act in the event that his principal fails therein." In any traffic case or tax case you are called into court and the judge reads the law and then asks, "Do you understand the charges?"

Defendant: No, your Honor, I do not.

Judge: "Well, what's so difficult about that charge? Either you drove the wrong-way on a one-way street or you didn't. You can only go one way on that street, and if you go the other way it's a fifty dollar fine. What's so difficult about this that you don't understand?"

Defendant: Well, Your Honor, it's not the letter of the law, but rather the nature of the law that I don't understand. The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution gives me the right to request the court to explain the nature of any action against me, and upon my request, the court has the duty to answer. I have a question about the nature of this action.

Judge: Well, what is that? What do you want to know? Always ask some easy questions first, as this establishes the fact that they are answering. You ask: Defendant: Well, your Honor, is this a Civil or a Criminal Action? Judge: It is a criminal. (If it were a civil action there could be no fine, so it has to be criminal.) Defendant: Thank you, your Honor, for telling me that. Then the record will show that this action against (your name) is a criminal action, is that right? Judge: Yes.

Defendant: I would like to ask another question about this criminal action. There are two criminal jurisdictions mentioned in the Constitution: one is under the Common Law, and the other deals with International Maritime Contracts, under Admiralty Jurisdiction. Equity is Civil, and you said this is a Criminal action, so it seems it would have to be under either the Common Law, or Maritime Law. But what puzzles me, your Honor, is that there is no corpus delecti here that gives the court a jurisdiction over my person and property under the Common Law. Therefore, it doesn't appear to me that this court is moving under the Common Law.

Judge: No, I can assure this court is not moving under the Common Law. Defendant: Well, thank you, your Honor, but now you make the charge against me even more difficult to understand. The only other criminal jurisdiction would apply only if there was an International Maritime Contract involved. I would have to a party to it, and it would have to be breached. Too, the court would have to be operating in an Admiralty Jurisdiction.
I don't believe I have ever been under any International Maritime contract, so I would deny that one exists. I would have to demand that such a contract, if it does exist, be placed in evidence, so that I would have the chance to contest it. But surely, this court is not operating under an Admiralty Jurisdiction.
You just put the words in the judges mouth.

Judge: No, I can assure you, we're not operating under an Admiralty Jurisdiction. We're not out in the ocean somewhere. We're right here in the middle of the State of (any state). No, this is not an Admiralty Jurisdiction. Defendant: Thank you your Honor, but now I am more puzzled that ever. If this charge is not under the Common Law, or under Admiralty -- and those are the only two criminal jurisdictions mentioned in the constitution -- what kind of jurisdiction could this court be operating under? Judge: It's Statutory Jurisdiction.

Defendant: Oh, thank you, your Honor. I'm glad you told me that. But I have never heard of that jurisdiction. So, if I have to defend under that jurisdiction, I would need to have the Rules of Criminal Procedure for Statutory Jurisdiction. Can you tell me where I might find those rules?

There are no rules for Statutory Jurisdiction; so the judge will get very angry at this point and say: Judge: If you want the answers to questions like that, you get yourself a licensed attorney. I'm not allowed to practice law from the bench.

Defendant: Oh, your Honor, I don't think anyone would accuse you of practicing law from the bench if you just answered a few questions to explain to me the nature of this action, so that I might defend myself.

Judge: I told you before, I am not going to answer any more questions. Do you understand that? If you ask any more questions in regards to this, I'm going to find you in contempt of court! Now if you can't afford a licensed attorney, the court will provide you with one. But if you want those questions answered, you must get yourself a licensed attorney.

Defendant: Thank you, your Honor, but let me just see if I got this straight. This court has made a legal determination that it has authority to conduct a criminal action against me, the accused, under a secret jurisdiction, the rules of which are known only to this court and licensed attorneys, thereby denying me the right to defend in my own person?

He has no answer for that. The judge will probable postpone the case and eventually just let it go. In this way, you can be as "wise as a serpent and as harmless as a dove, but you mustn't go into court with a chip on your shoulder and as a wolf in "black sheep" country. Remember the Savior's words, "I send you out as sheep in wolf country, be wise as a serpent, and harmless as a dove." Sheep do not attack wolves directly. Just be an innocent little lamb who just can't understand the charge. Remember, too, they can't try you criminally if you don't understand the charge. That would automatically be a reversible error on appeal.

The court reporter is sworn to give an accurate transcript of every word that is spoken in the courtroom. But if the judge makes a slip of the tongue, he turns to his court reporter and says, "I think you had better leave that out of the transcript. Just say it got a little too far ahead of you, and you couldn't quite get everything in." So this statement will be missing from the transcript. In one case, we brought a licensed court reporter with us and the judge got very angry and said, "This court has a licensed court reporter right here, and the record of this court is this court reporter's record. No other court reporter's record means anything in this court."

We responded with, "Of course, your Honor, we're certainly glad to use your regular court reporter. But you know, your Honor, sometimes things move so fast that a court reporter gets a little behind, and doesn't quite keep up with it all. Wouldn't it be nice if we had another licensed court reporter in the courtroom, just in case your court reporter got a little behind, so that we could fill in from this other court reporter's data. I'm sure, Your Honor, that you want an accurate transcript. (I like to use the saying: give a bad dog a good name, and he'll live up to it!) The judge went along with it, and from that moment on, he was very careful about what he said.

I still don't understand how the charges relate to the defendant, since it has no cognition or volition, and can't possibly understand anything. I am also trying to understand he nature of the action. The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution gives the right to request the court to explain the nature of an action, and upon request, the court has the duty to answer. I have a question about the nature of this action.

Well, your Honor, this is a Criminal Action, not a Civil Action, right?

I would like to ask another question about this criminal action. There are two criminal jurisdictions mentioned in the Constitution: one is Common Law, and the other deals with International Maritime Contracts, under Admiralty Jurisdiction. Equity is Civil, and this is a Criminal action, so it seems it must be either Common Law, or Maritime Law. What puzzles me, your Honor, is that there is no corpus delicti here that gives the court a jurisdiction over my person and property under the Common Law, so the action doesn't seem to be moving under Common Law.

:Claim of the Maxim: "_" with the meaning: "_" is with the claim of the origin by the century: ~_, Anno-Domini: author: _.

:Claim of the Etymology: For the word: _ is with the claim: "_" with the ONLINE ETYMOLOGY DICTIONARY by the Douglas: Harper. :Search.

:Claim of the Font: Italic: For the use of the italic-font is with the common-tongue of the verb-fiction. For a sample of this use is with the documentation for a quotation of a communication with the writing or speaking by its author. For another sample of the use is for the identification of the name of an fiction-entity.

:Claim of the Font: Bold: For the use of the bold-font is for the emphasis with a matter for the benefit of the ease of the identification and comprehension of the concepts of the document.

:Claim of the Font: Line: For the use of the font with a line at the base of the letters is for the web-link with the source for the confirmation of the matter, or with a page for the study of a concept of the document.

:Claim of the Punctuation: Colon: For the use of full colons is for the meaning as a phrase for the security of the next-word:: meaning word with the nexus, as a noun.

:Claim of the Punctuation: Quotation: For the use of the pairs of the opening and closing: quotation-marks is for the meaning as the quotation of a communication by another party.

:Claim of the Punctuation: Box: For the use of the pairs of the opening and closing: brackets, or parentheses is for the lack of the joinder with the communication of the body of the document by the law of the box. For the use of the box against the document is with the meaning as a private-note for the edification of the reader by the author. For the use of the box against a quotation is for the claims of the clarification of the meaning of the quotation.

For the sharing of these communications is for the spiritual-education, healing-benefit and sanctification of each living-soul as a private-communion with this minister, with the lack of any offer with the fiction-commerce of this world and with the lack of any negotiability between all parties as these cells in the Christ. For all truth and reality of all creation is with the ownership by the Creator. For all matters in the universe of each moment are as the gift for each soul with his love by our Lord. For any truth of these matters of this page and site for the study is for the knowledge and freedom of the soul, with the use with all love, charity, humility, honesty, wisdom and volition for the good of all souls of our friends and enemies, foreign and domestic, as a gift with the finding by the grace and will of our Lord. For all communications through this Ambassador of the Christ are by this Glen-Martin of the Swartwout-family©-commonlaw-trade-name/copyright/COPYCLAIM/copy-Christ with the claim of all powers for all truth in one law, with these claims with the law by our Lord:

~I: U.C.C.: §: ~I: ~CIII (UCC 103) with the correction of the language for the claims of the T.D.C. with the correction of the language for the claim of the Threat, Duress and Coersion by the Powers of this world against the will of our Lord; (Non A)ssumsit-Contract with the correction of the language for the lack of any authorization of any contract with the lack of full closure with the claim of the meaning of each word in the truth with the will by our Lord; and with the claim of the re:course for the freedom against the compelling of any benefit and against any claim of an occult-contract or claim of the commerce with any ficition; and with the claim of all re:course by our Lord.
~II: U.C.C.: §: ~I: ~CIII: ~VI (UCC 103.6) with the correction of the language for the claim of the common-Law of this Christendom of the sojourners of this Earth in the Kingdom of the Heaven with the creation and ownership by the Lord.
~III: U.C.C.: §: ~I: ~CCVII (UCC 207) with the correction of the language for the claim of the re:medy for the freedom of the contract against any force by the Powers of this world; with the claim of the volition against any contract of a debt-discharge with any association with the bankruptcy-scrip of the unity-States or with any fiction or fraud with the conveyance of any value; and with the claim of all re:medy by our Lord.
~IV: U.C.C.: §: ~I: ~CCVII: ~IV (UCC 207.4) With(out) the (Pre)judice with the correction of the language for the claim of the lack of any judgement of any Man by another Man; and with the claim of the judgement by our Lord.
~V: U.C.C.: §: ~I: ~CCVII: ~VII (UCC 207.7)with All Rights: (Re)serve(d) with the correction of the language for the claim of all rights, freedoms and powers by the will of our Lord.with the correction of the language for the claim against the waiver of any powers with the gift by our Lord.
~VI: New-Covenant with the correction of the language for the claim of one Law for the Love, Truth, Way and Life with the Will, Grace, Justice and Mercy by our Lord.
~VII: '"The law was made for man, not man for the law."' With the language correction of the claim: for the making of the law for the Men is with the lack of the making of the Men for the law, by our Creator.
:::'"the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient"'::: ~I: Timothy: ~I: ~IX.
~VIII: :::'"To love all people and all things is the key to being like God, the great lover"'::: Wisdom: ~XI: ~XXIV. :::'"You shall love your neighbor as yourself and the alien too."'::: Leviticus: ~IXX: ~IIXX, ~XXXIV; For the heart of the law is: love. :::'"You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart, your whole soul, your whole strength."'::: :Deuteronomy: ~VI: ~V.
~IX: :::'"I have not come to destroy the Law but to fulfill it. Amen, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or tittle of the Law will be lost until it is all fulfilled…. Unless your justice exceeds that of the scribes and the Pharisees, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven."'::: Matthew: ~V: ~XVII, ~IIXX, ~XX.