Government = Creator of the DEAD; God = Creator of the Living.
Government owns the NAME; Natural person controls it by Necromancy.

Hidden Contracts by Right Way Law
Source: RightWayLaw.com Volume VII, Issue 84

The term Straw Man, is defined in Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition as "A 'front'; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principle may direct respecting the property. A person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed." The term Stramineus homo, Black's Law Dictionary 4th Edition is defined as "A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety."

The government founded by the original Constitution is not in operation, but a de facto government has replaced the original government and is a Corporation operating in COMMERCE for a PROFIT. Every transaction is now considered by the US, INC., to be a commercial transaction by fictional entities.

In 1933, the governors of all the states met to discuss the "emergency" declared by FDR - the bankruptcy of the United States! They were meeting to discuss new process to administer the bankruptcy.

The state governors made a "pledge" to the US, INC., to fund the bankruptcy. They pledged the assets and the energy of the people belonging to the state governments. They would back the "government" and secure the national debt. But there was one problem: The states could only speak for the people in their public capacity. They could not pledge private, living human beings or property. So it was necessary to create a "bridge" between the living people and the creditors for the bankruptcy. The answer was to create Straw Men to stand in the place of the people. Now the only problem was devising a scheme whereby the people would agree to contract with the Straw man as its surety.

When the governors made the pledge, they agreed to register the birth certificates of the people with the U.S. Department of Commerce. The birth certificate is the security instrument (collateral) used to back the pledge. The Straw man, the legal fiction was created by using the name on the birth certificate and writing it in all capital letters, the designation for a legal fiction. Then, because of the "pledge", the people were determined to be the representative and surety for the legal fiction. You may find that the name on the birth certificate was not in all capital letters on some of the earlier Birth Certificates, but watch how the name appeared on every other document after the registration of the Birth Certificate. Look at the Social Security Card, School Records, Driver's Licenses, etc.

Surety is defined as 'the one who is responsible to pay.' The real man is the surety, who is liable by contract to pay for the debts and obligations of the Straw man.

When the "government" or any corporation uses any process whatsoever, they are using it against the legal fiction, which they want the people to think is them. But when a name is written in all capital letters, IT IS NOT the name of a real person! It is the designation of a legal fiction - that is an entirely separate entity. A living human cannot be a legal fiction, and a legal fiction cannot be a living human. One is real or natural, the other is created by "law". Because the entire thing is based on paying the bankruptcy, the Straw Man is the debtor and the "government" is agent for the creditor, the International Bankers.

Whenever a government agency (such as a court) determines liability it is a liability of the legal fiction or Straw Man since everything is done in commerce. The people are presumed, as evidenced by the pledge of their governors, to be the surety for the Straw Man and they must pay the liability.
The Straw Man is not a real live person, it is an artificial entity, a legal fiction. The Straw Man is created and controlled by the "government" because he has been pledged. In practical application, the Straw Man relationship, if understood, will give the real, flesh and blood being the ability to operate with all of his rights secured by the original Constitution. To get to that position all you have to do is pay the pledge!

Many people are using commercial process to pay the pledge and redeem the Straw Man from the pledge. This does not wrest the Straw Man from the government and make it theirs - they do not own it, nor do they want to own the Straw Man. The Straw Man is still owned by the Government who created him, but he is controlled by the people who have redeemed the pledge.

The Straw Man is a transmitting utility. Think of him as a pipe line through which passes goods and services from a main supply to customers; like a gas line to your house or water line. The creditors over the United States bankruptcy have the goods and services in their control. They cannot deal with living humans because they are not the real government; they are only a private corporation and can only do business with other artificial entities. If they deal with real people, their fiction disintegrates, and they are exposed for the illusion that they are.

So, in today's world, for a real living human to get the things he needs, he has to have an intermediate, an in-between, a Straw Man.

The key is in your relationship with the Straw Man. Before the Straw Man is redeemed, the "government" holds that entity as pledge for its debts. It owns and controls the Straw Man. Everything that passes through the pipe belongs to the "government" and anyone making a use of those things is presumed to be surety for the Straw Man.

Once the pledge is redeemed, the real being pays the pledge and becomes a creditor over the Straw Man, not the surety. He does not own the Straw Man, the government created it, he only controls it because the Straw Man is in debt to the real man. This is evidenced by registration to the title of the Straw Man with the Secretary of State on a UCC-1 or UCC-3 Financing Statement.

Since the real human is a creditor to the pipe line, he has an interest in everything that passes through the pipe line. He is no longer presumed surety.

What this does for the real man is demonstrated beautifully in the movie Amistad. In the movie Amistad, people from a village in Africa were taken prisoner, transported across the ocean until they finally ended up in the United States. During the first part of their trip they were taken to a slave trading station where they were sold to slave traders in Portugal. The slave traders were issued a Bill of Sale for the merchandise, listing the names and number of slaves sold. During the trip, supplies became scarce and fifty slaves were cruelly thrown overboard to their death. The records were altered to reflect a difference in the weights of cargo and the original records were hidden aboard the Amistad. The Africans managed to secure control of the ship, killing most of the crew, but were tricked by two remaining crew members into sailing into American waters. They were taken prisoners and charged with piracy and murder for the death of the crew members.

The first day of the court case the Bailiff called the case and read the charges by the government against the Africans. That claim was the first claim in the case. Then a series of other claims were made. A second claim was made by two commissioned officers as private citizens, claiming the Africans and the Ship based on their right to salvage. They showed a salvage title to support their claim. They were the only two of the crew that were not killed. It was these two that tricked the Africans into sailing onto American waters.

A third claim was made by the men who claimed to have purchased the slaves in Portugal. They claimed the slaves were their property and showed a warehouse receipt to prove their claim.

A fourth claim was made by men who were abolitionists. These men were interested in promoting anti-slavery, and filed a habeas corpus for the release of the Africans. There were two other claims as well.

When there is a claim filed against the Straw Man, the real, flesh and blood being, can file his own claim against the Straw Man as a non-party who has a security against the artificial entity, the property, being sued. He comes into court with his evidence of claim, a UCC-1 Financing Statement. The new claimant's position is, "I don't care what you do with the Straw Man, but before you get anything from him, my claim has to be settled, he owes me first!"

That is the remedy available for a real man who is creditor over the "government" created Straw Man. You will have to watch the movie to find out more about the Amistad Case!

When we look at courts and their operation it helps to use the chart shown on page 4. In this chart you can see that the real creditors in interest are not the people, the courts, the agencies or anyone else. In every case, civil or criminal, the courts are only balancing the books for the bankruptcy. The real creditors in interest are the International Banking Cartel and its agencies. They hold all the securities, the titles to the people, the land, the automobiles, the corporations, etc. They are in control of the public debt, and therefore control the public.

The owners, the agents of the controllers, hold equitable title so that they can act as agent in collecting for the bankruptcy. The owners are the de facto governments: The UNITED STATES, the STATES and the MUNICIPAL governments. The owners gather the titles and issue certificate of titles to evidence the pledges to the public. They are owners only, they do not control.

The tribunals are the public forum where disputes as to revenue are heard. The tribunals belong to the owners and are controlled by the creditors. No real, living human can enter the tribunal, only Straw men because it is a public forum. All people are presumed to be pledges to the public debt, and so they are brought into tribunals as surety for the public pledges of the Straw men.

In every case, the court is representing the real party in interest. A criminal case is always brought by the de facto government. A civil case is still owned by the court because the original documents are filed with the court who is the holder in due course of the case. The court will determine the controversy between the two parties, but their real goal is to determine what the two parties owe the real creditors in interest.

In every case, the court proceedings begin when someone files a complaint, citation, indictment, information or other instrument with the clerk of courts. The filing is an offer to the court. The court accepts through its agent the clerk, except that some things go directly before the magistrate and he accepts for the court. A contract has just been created. There are two parties, the court and the plaintiff, there is valuable consideration on both parts, and there is a security agreement, the complaint. The complaint sets forth the conditions by its jurisdictional and venue statements. The court is holder in due course of the security agreement, the complaint; and is therefore the creditor. The plaintiff is the debtor to the court in the matter.

The Chart on Page 4 shows a second contract. The court, as holder in due course, now solicits for a second contract. The court issues process, by summons, Writ or other invitational instrument as an offer to the target defendant. This is an opportunity for the defendant to contract in one of two capacities.

The target defendant can contract by making an offer to the court, soliciting the court to remain the holder in due course of the action; or he can accept for value the offer of the clerk and become the holder in due course of the action himself.

Chart 2 on page 9 shows the different ways that a target defendant can respond. Option #1 responses are nothing more than counter offers back to the court. That includes any response with issues as to facts or law on the case: Motions to Dismiss, Countercomplaints, Jurisdictional Challenges, etc. Silence or failure to appear also fit into this category. The target defendant offers his response to the clerk who accepts. The court now becomes the creditor in this new contract and the defendant is the debtor.

The clerk is an agent for the owner of the court; the corporate U.S., the corporate State, the corporate County or Municipality. The holder in due course takes the paper free from all claims. The court is absolutely holder in due course. No one can win except the court for the corporation because no other party is the holder in due course, all other parties fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. So far there has been no judicial action because there is no controversy. All parties agree that the court is the holder in due course of the claim, and that the defendant is the debtor.

You cannot sue the clerk she is only doing her job. The same thing when the magistrate issues a warrant, writ of execution or other process. He is only doing his job as holder in due course of the claim. Forget about fraud, deceit and conspiracy, there is none. These public officers are upholding their highest constitutional duty. They are protecting the Constitution and the citizens of the United States. When the people (the public) agreed to the Constitution they agreed to allow the government to borrow money and they agreed to back those debts. When the public could not pay their debts, the government had to protect them and the Constitution. To protect the people, they created artificial entities that would take the fall so the real private people could remain free. They pledged these entities for the debt to protect the Constitutional obligations. If they did not do this, the creditors, the international bankers, would have come and taken possession of every person, property and chattel. As it is, they only took possession of the Title to the things, and imposed a 'use' tax to pay for the bankruptcy. Remember, government does everything right. If you are not free, it is because you have not understood your commercial capacity, and have not learned to interface with the public.

The real man has no remedy by way of rights provided by the organic government because there are no officers to the organic Constitution. To make his way in the world he needs a commercial vessel that is the Straw Man. Once the Straw Man is redeemed, the real person becomes a creditor over the Straw Man; then the Straw Man as his vessel provides the ability for the real man to operate commercially in the world. Through Depositum Notice to the Public, the real man attaches to himself all the Constitutional Protections provided in the Bill of Rights. Since there are no Constitutional officers in office, there is no Constitutional Court; again, the real man has to find his remedy through Commercial process. He has to take option #2 on the chart on page ____ and bring evidence that he is a man whose governmental contract is the organic Constitution including the Bill of Rights. Internationally, that law must be recognized by all foreign courts. The only question remaining is a question of procedure.

In option #2 the statutory agent makes a claim on behalf of the Straw Man, like in Amistad. He accepts for value the offer from the administrative officer. The real man had better defend the vessel or he will end up serving as a crew member on another vessel as a slave.

When he accepts the claim he is not accepting the facts, law, jurisdiction, or any other point of the complaint, he is accepting the title to the claim. Now there are two claimants in the matter: the real parties of interest represented by the court, and the real, living man - There is a real controversy with a real claim.

When the real man accepts the case for value, the matter is not settled. There is a real case beginning. The matter of who has the highest title must be adjudicated. That, however, cannot be accomplished in the tribunal.

In the world of the organic Constitution, this case would have to be heard in an Article III court. However, since no officers now sit in an Article III Court, the case has to be heard by another method. If it is brought into the public forum, the case must involve two people of a public status. That would not work because neither of the parties of interest are in the public. The case must be heard privately.

Because there always has to be a remedy, when the country went into bankruptcy, the public government provided a method of hearing private claims. In fact, they made it so that all claims must be heard privately first to determine whether or not they have jurisdiction. The private claims are heard through the administrative process. Have you ever heard a court tell you that you have not exhausted your administrative procedure? No one has a claim, unless he has done this first.

The public government deals with the public through agencies. Once an agency is created, it is required to make rules and regulations by which it will deal with the public. These rules and regulations must be in line with the administrative procedures act so that everything is uniform and there will be less confusion in dealing with the thousands upon thousands of agencies. When a public person is dealing with a public agency, these rules must be followed before any public person brings a claim or they fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

A private person follows the same methods. He won't be citing the administrative procedures act, but that act was taken from administrative and commercial law, which has been developing from the beginning of time. If the private man does not exhaust his private administrative process, he fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

The acceptance for value of the court case is registered on a UCC-1 or UCC-3 form with the Secretary of State. The proof is a UCC-1 form is a certified statement from the Secretary of State, which in Ohio is obtained by using a UCC-11 form. The private man makes a claim by accepting for value the process issued by the court. That claim is then registered on a UCC-3 form, and evidence of the claim is presented by way of a UCC-11. Always keep the original; your signature is your power of attorney, if you give it up you are making an offer.

When the real man comes forward, like in Amistad, and claims to be creditor in the case, he then has to perfect his claim.

All courts today are equity. Under the laws of equity, to get equity you must do equity. That means that as long as you are doing administrative procedure, the public officials cannot proceed with their court action. First, the parties must exhaust their administrative remedies.

A note of caution must be stated here. Many people, including Right Way, have been teaching that this is the time to file a bill of exchange, and/or an I.R.S. 8300, and/or a criminal complaint against public officers. We have reconsidered this procedure and believe that is a mistake. Your claim has not been established, and all of these procedures are premature at this point. If you have not fully established your claim, then the use of these instruments could be interpreted by the public government as intimidation of witnesses, obstruction of justice, etc. It would be wise to use one of the best commercial terms available. "I made a mistake!" and withdraw your forms.

Administrative process consists of administrative questions asked to obtain stipulations and eventually a private administrative judgment. The effect is to defeat the government creditor's claim by impeaching their witness. The person signing the complaint is the witness that you have to impeach, not every witness they intend to bring against you, you don't even know who those witnesses will be. In a traffic case the witness is the police officer that signed the ticket. In a criminal case the witness would be the prosecutor signing the complaint. In a civil case it would be the attorney signing the complaint, etc.

If you start sending administrative questions to the other witnesses, you will probably find that you will be charged with intimidation of witnesses and obstruction of justice. They have no claim against you! They are only doing their job.

The administrative questions sent to the witness, are designed to get stipulations including: that you are the secured party, that you are a claimant and not a debtor, that they have seen no evidence that the government is a creditor. Then the questions can go on to establish that the entity the accuser allegedly represents does not exist and has no capacity to bring a claim. It could be established that the accuser has not taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, so has no capacity in dealing with a Secured Party whose law is the organic constitution. The questions could eventually show that according to the written statutory law the accuser has failed to state a claim. (See order number a101.55 and a101.56 Procedure Switch Levels 1 and 2 , for more information about this principle.)

The witness is informed that according to commercial and international private law, he has ten days to respond, and that if he does not respond each of the facts is stipulated. Many people ask a question and note that if the question is not answered then by procit tacuraton the fact is admitted or denied as the case may be. See order number a1554.01 Introduction to Administrative Remedies for more information on format for administrative questions. When the witness does not respond, then a notice of fault and notice to cure is sent restating the stipulations. The witness is informed that he has three days to respond. After three days with no response, a default is sent, followed by an administrative judgment filed with the County Recorder. After the judgment is recorded a certified copy of the judgment can be accepted for value and registered on a UCC-1 or UCC-3 form for evidence of the stipulations.

There are a couple of possibilities for administrative judgment that are being tossed around. One is that the administrative questions specify that responses are to be sent to the person who will eventually witness the administrative judgment. This person cannot be a party to the case. The administrative judgment is an affidavit from a non-party simply stating that he has first hand knowledge and proof that service was done, that the questions were sent, and that there were no responses. He can also witness to the facts that were set forth for stipulation. This man is not a judge. He is not making any conclusions of law, only evidencing the facts before him. If the responses are to be directed to him, he has first hand knowledge that there were no responses.

Another idea is to have a notary be the administrative witness. Have the responses directed to a notary, who can then do the administrative judgment as a witness to the facts concerning service, stipulations and that there was no response. The notary, as an agent of the court, can then enter the public side, with your private information, and make it appear on the record. [Notarial Protest?]

Note of caution: It is still premature to do a Bill of Exchange, I.R.S. 8300 form or criminal affidavit. You have not proved your claim; you have only impeached the government's witness. There are still two claimants; you and the International Bankers.

Now it is time to go to the court, agent for the other claimant with evidence of the UCC filings and the administrative judgment. With these stipulations in hand, you approach the court with administrative questions as to their claim. There can only be one claimant, and it is time for the public government claimant to prove his claim. The same process is followed to obtain an administrative judgment against the court. Now the witness is impeached and the court has stipulated it has no claim.

Note of caution: It is still not time to file a Bill of Exchange, I.R.S. 8300 form, or criminal affidavits. No one has harmed you. You may be in a court battle, but you are not in jail or facing fines, or you have not lost your property, etc.; or if you are in jail, have lost your property, etc., you still have to properly notice the court and they are acting without clean hands. Remember, the government does everything right.

Now you must go to the court privately, and through letter rogatory tell the judge to do his job and get rid of the case because it is void. It has been established that there is no claim. You don't move the court or appear in the case, you just make it obvious to the judge that he has only one course of action based on the records.

After every grace is given, every administrative process is completed, then the habeas corpus, criminal affidavits and other remedies are available, with stipulations that the public officials had no jurisdiction or authority to act as they did, i.e. no immunity.

Lets take a traffic case for example: If the court has ignored everything filed and proceeded to trial, they probably called the officer to the stand and asked him some questions. There is an administrative judgment against him in which he stipulated that he has no claim. If he testifies - or testifies contrary to the judgment, he is in breach of his contract. The court may find the accused guilty and demand fines or even impose jail time. After the trial, the procedure will be to accept the officer's testimony for value, register it on a UCC-3, and begin a second set of questions to the officer. These questions will establish that the officer is in violation of the agreement you had with him as to his testimony before trial. This new set of questions will get stipulations that there was an agreement, that he lied on the stand by testifying at all; followed by questions designed to impeach all the testimony given at trial. According to the law of equity, both parties should come out of the agreement fine. You are trying to correct a problem so that he is not liable or in trouble, and so that the case will be dropped for lack of a witness. Both sides come out fine.

This second administrative judgment is recorded as before and accepted for value, and is evidenced by a UCC-11. Now a second administrative judgment is done to the court to establish that they have no testimony and the judgment is void.

In many federal criminal cases, the first hearing is an identification hearing where the government brings in witnesses to testify that the person before them is the one they saw committing the acts: Not to the accuseds' status or name; but to the contract between the person and the court's jurisdiction. The court is making a contract with the living soul, so he is liable for the charges against the Straw Man. Again, administrative procedures serve to impeach the government's witnesses.