:FOR THE SOVEREIGN-CHARTER-VESSEL-CITIZEN IN THE PARTY
:VERUS:
FICTION PARLIAMENTARY COURT
FOR THE JURISDICTION OF A PLEADING IS WITH THE COURT BY ANY PARTY
WITH THE CORPORATION OF THE CHARTER-VESSEL-PAPER-PLEADING IN THE FOREIGN-COURT.

:S. = :SOVEREIGN-CITIZEN = FOR THE JURISDICTION OF THE SOVEREIGN IN THE COURT.
:F. = :FICTION-COURT = FOR THE JURISDICTION OF THE FICTION IN THE COURT.

:S. FOR THE SWEARING OF THE CLAIM IS WITH THE OATH IN THE TRUTH. THAT ALL FACTS IN THIS CASE ARE IN THE NOW-TENSE AS A NOUN-JURISDICTION . FOR THE NOUN AS THE VERB IS WITH THE VERB-FICTION-JURISDICTION IN THE FICTION OF AN OPINION-FICTION .
:F. THE OATH = I SWEAR, TO TELL, THE TRUTH, SO HELP, ME GOD, UNDER PENALTY, OF PERJURY.= ADVERB- VERB-FICTION ---ALL FICTION.

:S. FOR THE WITNESS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE IS WITH THE CLAIM FOR THE PARTY IN THE TRUTH. FOR THE PARTY OF THE VACATION OF THE GUILT IS WITH THE VACATION OF THE KNOWLEDGE. FOR THE PARTY OF THE "NOT GUILTY"; IS WITH THE GUILT AS THE VERB FOR THE CORPORATION OF THE COURT IN THE VERB-JOINDER IN THE FICTION. FOR THE TERM: "NO CONTEST" =(ADVERB-VERB) IS FOR THE SAME.

	1	2	2	4	1	3	4	1	3	4
:F.	THE	PERSON	IS	GUILTY	TILL	PROVEN	INNOCENT	IN	FICTION	LANGUAGE

:S. FOR THE PARTY WITH THE KNOWLEDGE IS WITH THE PLEADING IN THE NOUN AND IN THE TRUTH FOR THE FACTS ARE WITH THE SUBJECT-MATTER-JURISDICTION OF THE C.U.S.W.F.-COURT.
:F. FOR THE FICTION-COURT OF THE FICTION-FRINGE-FLAG IS FOR THE TORT AGAINST THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTY. FOR THE WORD: "RIGHT" AS A OPINION IS WITH THE PLACEMENT OF THE WORD: "CLAIM".

:S. FOR THE SOVEREIGN-CHARTER-VESSEL OF THE FILING IS WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT FOR THE CLAIM. FOR ALL PARTIES OF THE FILING ARE FOR THE CHARTER-VESSEL-CONTRACT BETWEEN THE FOREIGN-JURISDICTION OF THE TITLE~28: U.S.C.S.~1605 , FOR THE CONTRACT-CLAIM OF THE COURT FOR THE PLEADINGS BY THE PARTY. FOR THE PARTY WITH THE KNOWLEDGE IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE C.C.= OF THE CIVIL-CLAIMS.
:F. FOR THE FICTION-COURT CAN ONLY BRING MOTION WITH THE PARLIAMENTARY-OATH THAT IS SWORN TO AN ENGLISH-PARLIAMENT IN THE FICTION WITH THE PRACTICE OF THE FICTION IN THE VIOLATION OF THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY-ACT WITH THE VACATION OF THE PEOPLE IN THE COURT IN THE WORLD. [THIS IS WRITTEN IN FICTION-LANGUAGE]

:S. FOR THE CLAIM OF THE PARTY IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE TRUTH.
:F. FOR THE MOTION IS WITH THE PARLIAMENTARY-COURT OF THE FOREIGN-FICTION.

:S. WHEN THE PARLIAMENTARY-COURT OF THE CLAIM IS WITH THE CORPORATION-CASE-FILING WITH THE JOINDER/UNITY WITH THE [FICTION-CIVIL-AUTHORITIES] ARE WITH THE FAULT OF THE VIOLATION OF THE PARTY'S-RIGHTS FOR THE RIGHT OF THE GRIEVANCE. FOR THE MILITARY OF THE CLAIM IS WITH THE CONTROL OF THE COURT WHEN THE CIVIL-AUTHORITIES FAIL FOR THE CLAIM OF THE PLEADINGS OF THE PARTY AND FOR THE VIOLATIONS OF THE CHARTER-VESSEL-CONTRACT .
:F. FOR THE FICTION IS WITH THE ARREST OF THE MILITARY FOR THE MISAPPROPRIATIONS OF THE GOVERNMENTS-DOCUMENTS IN THE FICTION WITH THE TORT OF THE PARTY'S-RIGHTS IN THE COURT, FOR THE KIDNAPPING IN THE NEGLECT OF THE TITLE~42: U.S.C.S.~1986 FOR THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW FOR THE NEGLECT OF THE STOPPING AND CORRECTING OF THE WRONGS FOR THE FICTION-LANGUAGE WITH THE FICTITIOUS-LANGUAGE OF THE TITLE~18: U.S.C.S.~1001 AND ~1002 = [FOR THE PRISON-TERM OF THE ~10-YEARS OR LESS, OR FOR THE FINE OF THE 31-TROY-OUNCES OF THE .999-FINE-GOLD ] IN THE TORT AND MISPRISON OF A FELON WITH THE TITLE~18: U.S.C.S.~4 , FOR THE ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT = WITH THE TITLE~18: U.S.C.S.~THREE(3) FOR THE TORT OF THE CLAIMS OF THE CHARTER-VESSEL-CITIZEN IN THE PARTY BY THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND BY THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT IN THE WRITTEN-PAPERS OF THE COURT'S-HANDWRITING AND BY THE SWEARING INTO THE FRAUD AND PERJURY OF THE OATH BY THE OFFICERS OF THE COURT.

:S. FOR THE COURT OF THE WRITTEN-MOTION IS WITH THE FICTION BY THE MODIFICATION OF THE WRITTEN-WORD . FOR THE AFFIRMATION(OUTSIDE OF THE NOW-TIME-QUANTUM ) OF THE PERJURY(FICTION OF THE LANGUAGE-CLAIMS ) OF THIS PARLIAMENTARY(KINGS)-MOTION-PLEADINGS AGAINST THE PARTY. FOR THE FICTION-PARLIAMENTARY-COURT OF THE WRITTEN-PLEADINGS ARE WITH THE CHARGES IN THE FUTURE-TENSE OF THE FACTS WITH THE VACATION OF THE NOW-TENSE-JURISDICTION WITH THE VACATION OF THE PARTY, FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE DUE-PROCESS WITH THE CHARGES OF THE VASSALEE FOR THE CONCLUSION OF THE PLEA WITH THE FICTION-PRESUMPTION OF THE CHARGES IN THE COURT OF THE FICTION-PARLIAMENTARY -COURT .

C.U.S.W.F. = FOR THE CONSTITUTION/CONTRACT OF THE UNITY-STATES OF THE WORLD-FLAG
U.S.C.S. = FOR THE UNITY-STATES-CLAIMS : SECTION

:©:COPYCLAIM: SEPTEMBER~20~2002 BY THE David-Wynn: Miller, :LANGUAGE-CLAIMS.

Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1856) [Internet edition], http://www.constitution.org/bouv/bouvierf.txt [as of August 7, 2002]:
FICTION OF LAW. The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing, a quality which is not natural to it, and establishes, consequently, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist, but which the law prescribes or authorizes; it differs from presumption, because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true. Dalloz, Dict. h.t. See 1 Toull. 171, n. 203; 2 Toull. 217, n. 203; 11 Toull. 11, n. 10, note 2; Ferguson, Moral Philosophy, part 5, c. 10, s. 3 Burgess on Insolvency, 139, 140; Report of the Revisers of the Civil Code of Pennsylvania, March 1, 1832, p. 8.
2. The law never feigns what is impossible. fictum est id quod factum non est sed fieri potuit. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it. It aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which is not, exists; but it will never feign that what was impossible, actually is. D'Aguesseau, Oeuvres, tome iv. page 427, 47e Plaidoyer.
3. Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors, who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it, under the pretence of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness, which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact, what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench. 4 Benth. Ev. 300.
4. It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. 10 Co. 42; 10 Price's R. 154; Cowp. 177. To prevent, their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require. 1 Lill. Ab. 610; Hawk. 320; Best on Pres. Sec. 20.
5. The law abounds in fictions. That an estate is in abeyance; the doctrine of remitter, by which a party who has been disseised of his freehold, and afterwards acquires a defective title, is remitted to his former good title; that one thing done today, is considered as done, at a preceding time by the doctrine of relation; that, because one thing is proved, another shall be presumed to be true, which is the case in all presumptions; that the heir, executor, and administrator stand by representation, in the place of the deceased are all fictions of law. "Our various introduction of John Doe and Richard Roe," says Mr. Evans, (Poth. on Ob. by Evans, vol. n. p. 43,) "our solemn process upon disseisin by Hugh Hunt; our casually losing and finding a ship (which never was in Europe) in the parish of St. Mary Le Bow, in the ward of Cheap; our trying the validity of a will by an imaginary wager of five pounds; our imagining and compassing the king's death, by giving information which may defeat an attack upon an enemy's settlement in the antipodes, our charge of picking a pocket, or forging a bill with force and arms; of neglecting to repair a bridge, against the peace of our lord the king, his crown and dignity are circumstances, which, looked at by themselves, would convey an impression of no very favorable nature, with respect to the wisdom of our jurisprudence." Vide 13 Vin. Ab. 209; Merl. Rep. h.t.; Dane's Ab. Index, h.t.; and Rey, des Inst. de I'Angl. tome 2, p. 219, where he severely censures these fictions as absurd and useless.
4.a. From 16A Words and Phrases, Permanent Edition (supplemented to 1989), p. 27, FICTION OF LAW:
It seems to be a rule founded in common sense, as well as strict justice, that fictions of law shall not be permitted to work any wrong, but shall be used ut res magis valeat quam pereat, 3 Rep. 28, b. and this rule, so equitable in itself, seems recognized in the common law. 13 Rep. 21; 2 Vent. 200. United States v. 1960 Bags of Coffee (1814), 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 398, 415, 3 L.Ed. 602, 608.
4.b. I didn't understand the translation of the Latin phrase "ut res magis valeat quam pereat", so looked it up:
Ut res magis valeat quam pereat. That the matter may have effect rather than fail.
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY , 7th Ed. (1999), p. 1697.
5.
Fictitious. Founded on a fiction; having the character of a fiction; pretended; counterfeit. Feigned, imaginary, not real, false, not genuine, nonexistent. Arbitrarily invented and set up, to accomplish an ulterior object.
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY , 6th Ed. (13th reprint, 1998), p. 624.
6.
Fictio cedit veritati. Fictio juris non est ubi veritas Fiction yields to truth. Where there is truth, fiction of law exists not.
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY , 6th Ed. (13th reprint, 1998), p. 623.
7.
Fictio legis inique operatur alicui damnum vel injuriam A legal fiction does not properly work loss or injury. Fiction of law is wrongful if it works loss or injury to anyone.
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY , 6th Ed. (13th reprint, 1998), p. 623.
8.
Fictitious plaintiff. A person appearing in the writ, complaint, or record as the plaintiff in a suit, but who in reality does not exist, or who is ignorant of the suit and the use of his name in it. It is a contempt of court to sue in the name of a fictitious party.
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY , 6th Ed. (13th reprint, 1998), p. 624.
9.
...The assent can get back to the date of delivery to the stranger only by virtue of the doctrine of relation, which is a fiction of law in which there is always equity, never working an injury, and which is never permitted or applied so as to do wrong to third persons . (Broom's Legal Maxims, " In fictione juris ," etc. 128, and cases cited; ... A fiction of law "is defined to be a legal assumption that a thing is true which is either not true, or which is as probably false as true ; the rule on this subject being that the court will not endure that a mere form or fiction of law, introduced for the sake of justice, should work a wrong contrary to the real truth and substance of the thing." (Per Lord Mansfield, C. J., Johnson v. Smith , 2 Burr. 962; Broom's Legal Maxims, 128.)"
(emphasis added) Hibberd v. Smith (1885), 67 Cal. 547.
10.
"Even accepting the fiction that, as applied to drivers, motor vehicle responsibility statutes are intended to promote safety, it is just too much fiction to contend that, applied to a judgment debtor held vicariously liable for the omission of a sub-agent, the statute is anything but a means of enforcement of judgments." Miller v. Anckaitis, 436 F2d 115, 118 (CA3 1970) (enbanc) [cert. den. 403 U.S. 910, 29 L.Ed.2d 688, 91 S.Ct. 2203].
Perez v. Campbell (1971), 402 U.S. 637, 29 L.Ed.2d 233, 244 fnt. 14, 91 S.Ct. 1704. :Source.

The United States Supreme Court discusses the matter of fictions of law in various decisions:

a. “Since the corporate personality is a fiction, although a fiction intended to be acted upon as though it were a fact, Klein v. Tax Supers. 282 US 19, 24, 75 L ed 140, 143, 51 S Ct 15, 13 ALR 679, it is clear that unlike an individual its "presence" without, as well as within, the state of its origin can be manifested only by activities carried out in its behalf by those who are authorized to act for it.” International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington (1945), 326 U.S. 310, 90 L.Ed. 95, 66 S.Ct. 154.

b. “The state does not, by becoming a corporator, identify itself with the corporation. The Planters' Bank of Georgia is not the state of Georgia, although the state holds an interest in it.
It is, we think, a sound principle, that when a government becomes a partner in any trading company, it devests itself, so far as concerns the transaction of that company of its sovereign character, and takes that of a private citizen. Instead of communicating to the company its privileges and its prerogatives, it descends to a level with those with whom it associates itself, and takes the character which belongs to its associates, and to the business which is to be transacted.” (emphasis added) The Bank of the United States v.The Planters' Bank of Georgia (1824), 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 904, 907, 6 L.Ed 244.

c. The Constitution constrains governmental action “by whatever instruments or in whatever modes that action may be taken.” Ex parte Virginia, 100 US 339, 346-347, 25 L Ed 676 (1880) "And under whatever congressional label... Facing the question of Amtrak's status for the first time, we conclude that it is an agency or instrumentality of the United States for the purpose of individual rights guaranteed against the Government by the Constitution.... Even Congress itself appeared to acknowledge, at least until recent years, that Government-created and -controlled corporations were part of the Government. The Government Corporation Control Act of 1945, discussed above, which brought to an end an era of uncontrolled growth of Government corporations, provided that, without explicit congressional authorization, no corporation should be acquired or created by "any officer or agency of the Federal Government or by any Governmental corporation for the purpose of acting as an agency or instrumentality of the United States...." sec 304(a), 59 Stat, at 602. That was evidently intended to restrict the creation of all Government-controlled policy-implementing corporations, and not just some of them. And the companion provision that swept away many of the extant corporations said that no wholly owned government corporation created under state law could continue "as an agency or instrumentality of the United States," sec. 304(b), 59 Stat, at 602....
It surely cannot be that government, state or federal, is able to evade the most solemn obligations imposed in the constitution by simply resorting to the corporate form...." Lebron v. National R. Passenger Corp. (1995), 130 L.Ed.2d 902, 914-923.