IN THE COURT OF THE DI-STRICT OF THE UNITY-STATES OF THE [AMERICA]WORLD FOR THE HILO: IN THE DI-STRICT IN THE [DE-FACTO-STATE]KINGDOM OF THE HAWAII IN THE KINGDOM OF THE HEAVENS WITH THE REIGN OF THE PRIEST/KING/JUDGE: Yeshua-ben: Joseph: bar: Abba.

Glen-Martin: ben: John-Baxter: Swartwout: bar: Abba [:witness with the knowledge of the Truth]:

CLAIMANT FOR THE CORPORATION-CASE: S.P. No. 00-1-0038WITH THE UNITY-STATES-POSTAL-REGISTRATION-NUMBER: R-_____-_____-_____FOR THE CLAIM OF THE CORRECTION OF THE LANGUAGE PROCEDURES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE FOR THE REGISTRATION IS WITH THE CASE: S.P. No. 00-1-0038

VERSUS THE MAMO BROWN, Auditor, Hawaii Branch, Unemployment Insurance, Hilo Claims Office (sic),

Robert K. Kualii, Deputy High Sheriff

Linda S. Usato, Administrator, Unemployment Insurance Division (sic),

EARL I. ANZAI, Attorney General of Hawai' i (sic),

STACI I. WONG, Deputy Attorney General, Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawai' i, Labor Division (sic),

LORRAINE H. AKIBA, Director of Labor and Industrial Relation, State of Hawai' i (sic),

GILBERT S. COLOMA-AGARAN, Director of Labor and In!dustrial Relation, State of Hawai' i (sic),

The Honorable Riki May Amano (sic),RICKI MAY AMANO, THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAII (SEAL), JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT (sic),

GREG K. NAKAMURA,THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAII (SEAL), JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT (sic),

C. OKAWA, CLERK, CIRCUIT COURT, THIRD CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI' I (sic),

S. ENOKA, CLERK, THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAII (sic),

Bill [?], Clerk, Third Circuit Court, State of Hawaii (sic)

:VASSALEES

ABBREVIATIONS: USAG = UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GOVERNMENT(sic)

U.S.A. = UNITY-STATES OF THE AMERICA (WITH THE TREATY OF THE UN)(s.i.c.)

(s.i.c.) = Simulation-In-Consistancy with the original-text or accuracy of the simulation : For the International-Protest by the charter-vessel: Glen-Martin: Swartwout is with the Kingdom of the Hawai' i and Unity-States of the America. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout, as a subject of the Hawaiian-Kingdom, is with the protest of any acts by the citizens of the Unity-States of the America with the claim in the fiction and fraud for the authority with the guise of a United States Government State (s.i.c.) of the verb-fiction, within the dominion and sovereignty of the Islands ofthe Hawai' i. For the Claimant with the knowledge is with the claim with the truth-language-procedures for the treaties, international-law and civil-rights against the violation by the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT STATE. For the issue of the S.P. No. 00-1-0038 is with the facts and base in the law of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i with the truth-language-procedures as a tribunal within the meaning of the Article: VIII of the Treaty of the year: 1850 by the Third Circuit Court (s.i.c.) of the verb-fiction of the State of Hawaii (s.i.c.). For the Hawai'i-Court in the truth with the knowledge is with the authority for the truthful-procedures and jurisdiction with the treaty of the year-1850. For the enforcement claim of the law is with the oath in the truth of the obedience of the law. For the claim enforcement of the verb-fiction-law is with the perjury of the oath of the enforcer by the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT STATE. For the witness with the knowledge is with the claim protest of the actions of the parties with the intent of the impairment of the contract by the conveyance of the language by the fiction, for the tort with the presumption by the use of the pronouns, modifications of the facts by the adjectives and adverbs for the violation of the rights and of the money as the apartheid, genocide and rape by the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT STATE. For the objection against the language of the fiction is with no accuracy for the communication of the truth. For the need of the restatement is for the communication of the essence of the truth with the noun as the noun and the fact as the fact with no modification and/or presumption. For the charge with the treason and with the purjury of the oath is with the Title: 18: u.s.a.-claim: section: 241: for the conspiracy in the fiction:

MAMO BROWN, Auditor, Hawaii Branch, Unemployment Insurance, Hilo Claims Office (s.i.c.],

Robert K. Kualii, Deputy High Sheriff

Linda S.(?] Usato, Administrator, Unemployment Insurance Division (sic),

EARL I. ANZAI, Attorney General of Hawai' i (sic),

STACI I. WONG, Deputy Attorney General, Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawai' i, Labor Division (sic),

LORRAINE H. AKIBA, Director of Labor and Industrial Relation, State of Hawai' i (sic),

GILBERT S. COLOMA-AGARAN, Director of Labor and Industrial Relation, State of Hawai' i (sic),

The Honorable Riki May Amano (sic), RICKI MAY AMANO, THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAII (SEAL), JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT (sic),

GREG K. NAKAMURA, THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAII (SEAL), JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT (sic),

C. OKAWA, CLERK, CIRCUIT COURT, THIRD CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI' I (sic),

S. ENOKA, CLERK, THIRD CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF HAWAII (sic),

Bill, Clerk, Third Circuit Court, State of Hawaii (sic)

with the action against the Remission-Foundation: Trust as the contract by the right of the grantor as the sovereign: Glen-Martin: Swartwout and of the trustees for the beneficiary. For the guarantee of the protection of the trust is with the Constitution of the Unity-States of the America. For the grantor of the trust is with the claim as the citizen of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i. For the vassalee as the non-resident-alien is with the identification as the United States of America (sic). For the party with the knowledge is with the correction of the language in the truth with the nouns as the nouns and with no modification of the nouns by the adjectives as the modification of the facts or the substitution of the nouns with the pronouns as the presumption or the modification by the adverbs of the noun-truth as the verb-fiction. For the identification of the use of the word is by the number:

1: Adverb

2: Verb

3: Adjective

4: Noun

5: Past-Tense

6: Future-Tense

7: Pronoun

8: Preposition

9: Article

0: Conjunction

EARL I. ANZAI 2904

For the meaning in the truth of the list of the EARL I. ANZAI 2904 (sic) is for the NOM-DE-GUERRE of the DEAD-CORPORATION with the list of the number: 2904 by the double-space.

Attorney General of Hawai' i

For the meaning of the Attorney General of Hawai' is for the obstruction by the modification of the fiction with the presumption of the jurisdiction in the Kingdom of the Hawai' i.

STACI I. WONG 5879

For the meaning in the truth of the list of the STACI I. WONG 5879 is for the NOM-DE-GUERRE of the DEAD-CORPORATION with the list of the number: 5879 by the double-space.

Deputy Attorney General

For the meaning in the truth of the Deputy Attorney General is for the obstruction by the modification of the fiction.

Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawai'i

For the meaning in the truth of the Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawai'i is for thepresumption of a department with the modification by the attorney for the presumption of a general in the conjunction of the consipiracy of the presumption of a state with a presumption of the Hawai' i.

Labor Division

For the meaning in the truth of the Labor Division is for the modification of the facts by the labor of the presumption of a division.

425 Queen Street Honolulu, Hawai' i 96813 Telephone: 586-1450 Attorneys for DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, STATE OF HAWAI' I

For the meaning in the truth of the Attorneys for DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, STATE OF HAWAI' I is for the presumption of the attorneys for the presumption of a department of the presumption of the labor in the conjunction with the modification by the industrialists of the presumption of a relationship in the conjunction with the consipiracy of the presumption of a state with a presumption of the Hawai' i.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

For the meaning in the truth of the IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT is for the modification by the circuitousness of the presumption: court of the modification: third of the presumption: circuit. For the function of the circuit is for the continuity of the modification by the language of the facts for the obstructionof the truth.

STATE OF HAWAI' I

For the meaning in the truth of the STATE OF HAWAI' I is for the consipiracy of the presumption of a state with a presumption of the lawfullness of the overthrow of the Kingdom of the Hawai'i.

In the Matter of

For the meaning in the truth of the In the Matter of is for the identification of the matter of the subject with the noun as the noun and the fact as the fact.

GILBERT S. COLOMA-AGARAN, Director of Labor and Industrial Relation, State of Hawai' i,

For the meaning in the truth of the GILBERT S. COLOMA-AGARAN, Director of Labor and IndustrialRelation, State of Hawai' i, is for the identification of the NOM-DE-GUERRE of the DEAD-CORPORATION of the fiction with the presumption as the director of the labor in the conjunction with the modification by the industrialists of the presumption of a relationship in the conjunction with the consipiracy of the presumption of a state with a presumption of the Hawai' i.

Plaintiff,

For the meaning in the truth of the Plaintiff is for the presumption as the plaintiff.

Vs.

For the meaning in the truth of the Vs. is for the claim of the representation of the1 no joinder by the disjunction with of the quantum by the truthful-language-procedures procedure of the language.

Remission Foundation Trust

For the meaning in the truth of the Remission Foundation Trust is for a Trust in the Lord by a party with the enslavement by the fiction for the Foundation of the Remission of the Sin and Disease as the effect of the sin. For the truth of the fiction is with the formation of the trust-language by the teaching of the public-schoools of Hawai'i (sic) for the fraud with the appropreation of the taxes and fees for the public-schools in the fiction for the slavery of the people with the certification of the people's fiction and vassal of the usa-government.

Defendant.

For the meaning in the truth of the Plaintiff is for the fiction presumption as the plaintiff.

S.P. No. 00-1-00383 (Hilo)

For the meaning in the truth of the S.P. No. 00-1-0038(Hilo) is for the modification of a presumption and for the identification of the number of the case with the noun as the noun.

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE, TESTIMONY AND PRODUCTION OF RECORDS

For the meaning in the truth of the ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE, TESTIMONY AND PRODUCTION OF RECORDS is for the claim and affirmation of the fiction as the noun by the USAG and as a presumption with no noun as the subject: matter.

HEARING: DATE: September 8, 2000 TIME: 8:00 a.m. JUDGE: The Honorable Ricki May Amano

For the meaning in the truth of the HEARING: DATE: September 8, 2000 TIME: 8:00 a.m. JUDGE: The Honorable Riki May Amano is for the identification of the presumptions/modifications of the date, time and judge of the case.

ORDER

For the meaning in the truth of the ORDER is by the presumption.

Plaintiff Director of Labor and Industrial Relations (Director) Petition to Compel Attendance, Testimony and Production of Records, having been filed on 18 August 4, 2000, and having come on for hearing before the Honorable Riki May Amano on September 8, 2000 with Staci I. Wong, Deputy Attorney General, appearing on behalf of the Director, and no one appearing on behalf of the Remission Foundation Trust, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and read the moving papers, hereby grants the Petition.

For the meaning in the truth of the Plaintiff Director of Labor and Industrial Relations' (Director) Petition to Compel Attendance, Testimony and Production of Records, having been filed on August 4, 2000, and having come on for hearing before the Honorable Riki May Amanoon September 8, 2000 with Staci I. Wong, Deputy Attorney General, appearing on behalf of the Director, and no one appearing on behalf of the Remission Foundation Trust, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and read !the moving papers, hereby grants the Petition is withthe nouns of the 2000 and Director as the subject: matter with no joinder with the now-tense by the use of the past-tense and future-tense.

IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that the Remission Foundation Trust, Defendant above-named, is to appear before Mamo M. Brown, Auditor, Hawai' i Branch at the Unemployment Insurance Hilo Claims Office, 777 Kilauea Avenue #122, Hilo, Hawaii 96720 on October 4, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. to testify and answer such pertinent questions as may be put to it by the Administrator of the Unemployment Insurance Division, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of the State of Hawaii, or her duly authorized representative in regard to the determination of liability under the Hawaii Employment Security Law due by said Defendant and to bring with it the following books and papers: cash books, check registers, canceled checks ,accounts receivable, general ledger, journals, payroll records, individual compensation records,time books, invoices, and all other business records in connection with its business.

For the meaning in the truth of the IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED that the Remission Foundation Trust, Defendant above-named, is to appear before Mamo M. Brown, Auditor, Hawai' i Branch at the Unemployment Insurance Hilo Claims Office, 777 Kilauea Avenue #122, Hilo, Hawaii 96720 on October 4, 2000, at 9:00 a.m. to testify and answer such pertinent questions as may be put to it by the Administrator of the Unemployment Insurance Division, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of the State of Hawaii, or her duly authorized representative in regard to thedetermination of liability under the Hawaii Employment Security Law dueby said Defendant and to bring with it the following books and papers: cash books, check registers, canceled checks, accounts receivable, general ledger, journals, payroll records, individual compensation records,time books, invoices, and all other business records in connection with its business is with no qualification as a sentence by the violation of the FEDERAL-STYLES-MANUAL by the modification of the facts by the adjectives and adverbs for the presumption and assumption, by the Future-Tense and by the Past-Tense.

Failure to appear on October 4, 2000 at 9:00 a.m., shall be deemed a willful and deliberate disregard of legal process and will subject you to penalty including contempt of court. note: as the court is as a fiction-verb. For the court with the knowledge is with a fraud with the truth with the people on its face. \cf0 For the meaning in the truth of the \ldblquote Failure to appear on October 4, 2000 at 9:00 a.m., shall be deemed a willful and deliberate disregard of legal process and will subject you to penalty including contempt of court\rdblquote is for the threat in the fiction.

DATED: Hilo, Hawai' i, SEP 13, 2000 [stamp].

For the meaning in the truth of the DATED: Hilo, Hawai' i, SEP 13 2000 [stamp] is for the presumption of the jurisdiction in the past-tense in the fiction.

GREG K. NAKAMURA [stamp] JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT For Riki May Amano [stamp]

For the meaning in the truth of the GREG K. NAKAMURA [stamp]JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT For Riki May Amano [stamp] is for no autograph for no authority with the substitution of the DEAD for the living with no autograph for the authority of the judges.

I hereby certify that this is a full, true and correct copy of the original on file in this office. (for the autograph is with no readability) [for the name is with no printing] Clerk, Third Circuit Court, State of Hawaii [stamp] For the meaning in the truth of the I hereby certify that this is a full, true and correct copy of the original on file in this office. (for the autograph is with no readability: Bill?) [for the name is with no printing] Clerk, Third Circuit Court, State ofHawaii [stamp] is for no clerk with an identity for the lack of responsibility in the filing of the ducument in the fiction.

Background

For the education by the Patrick: Ka`ano`i is with the activity in the North-American-Vexillological-Association as the association of the members with the dedication for the study and meaning of the flags: Ka Hae Hawai`i - the Hawaiian Flag (ratio 1: 2) was commissioned by Kamehameha the Great in 1816 during the Hawaiian religious Kapu system.

The eight alternating white, red and blue strips representation with the eight major islands of Hawai`i. The British Union Jack is with the rerepresentation of the Hawai`i's historical relationship with the Great Britain as it's protectorate as well as suggesting a stylized representation of a puela - for a triangular standard laying across two crossed spears called an alia - which is the symbol of an ali`i - chief. This representation is clearly illustrated at the center of the royal Seal of Hawai`i.

Although Hawai`i's independence was temporarily challenged by Lord Paulette of Great Britain in 1843, Great Britain sent Admiral Thomas to officially restore and recognize Hawai`i's independence and Hawaiian Flag on July 31, 1843 at what is now called Thomas square in Honolulu, Hawai`i. On that same day at Kawaiaha`o church Kamehameha III first proclaimed the motto, "Ua mau ke ea o ka `aina i ka pono." "The life [independence] of the land is perpetuated in righteousness." Kamehameha III officially recommissioned and dedicated our present Hawaii!an Flag on May 20, 1845 at the opening of the Kingdoms legislature. The Hawaiian Flag has represented Hawai`i for over 180 years with the fiction-language.\pardFor the 28\super th\nosupersub of the month: November in the year: 1843 is by the Great-Britain and France for the recognition of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i as a State with the independence, with "a governmentcapable of providing for the regularity of its relations with foreign nations." For the Lawful-Hawaiian-Government is in the fact with the reinstatement by the International-Public-Law, U.S.-Public-Law: 103-150, and Hawaiian-Kingdom-Domestic-Law. For the Article-I: Section-8: Clause-10 of the U.S.-Constitution is with the observance of the Law-of-Nations. For The Law-of-Nations (1758) is with the statement:

"Proof can be had from the works on the natural law that liberty and independence belong to man by his very nature, and that they can not be taken from him without his consent...But the whole body of the Nation, the State, so long as it has not voluntarily submitted to other men or other Nations, remains absolutely free and independent."

FOR THE CLAIM OF THE NATURAL-LAW OF THIS LIBERTY AND FREEDOM IS WITH THE GOD OF THE PEOPLE OF THE HAWAII BY THE NATURE OF THE FREEDOM FOR THE SPEECH, PRESS, TRAVEL, AND COMMERICE WITH THE CONTRACT OF THE LAW OF THE MARITIME AND ADMIRALTY WITH THE CLOSURE OF THE CONTRACT OF THE CONSENT.. FOR THE CLAIM OF THE HAWAII-NATION IS WITH THE PEOPLE OF THIS STATE AND WITH THE FREEDOM OF ALL NATIONS OF THE EARTH.

For the conditions of the International-Public-Law is of the four for the quality as a nation: Territory, Population, Sovereignty, and Government. For the territory of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is as with theQueen: Lili' uokalani with the protest of the unlawfulness of the overthrow. For the population is with the identification and oath in theyear of our Lord: 1999, with the Glen-Martin: Swartwout as the citizen. For the inherence of the sovereignty is with the recognition and admission by the U.S.-Public-Law: 103-150 with the statement:

Whereas, on January 14, 1893, John L. Stevens . . . the United States Minister assigned to the sovereign and independent Kingdom of Hawai!i conspired with a small group of non-Hawaiian residents of the Kingdom of Hawaii, including citizens of the United States, to overthrow the indigenous and lawful Government of Hawaii; . . . . . Whereas, . . . the Provisional Government . . . was unable to rally thesupport from two-thirds of the Senate needed to ratify a treaty of annexation;.. Whereas the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their nationallands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum . . . Now therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled . . . (3) apologizes to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the people of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii on January 17, 1893 with the participation of agents and citizens of the United States, and the deprivation of the rights of Native Hawaiians to self-determination; (4) expresses its commitment to acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, in order to provide a proper foundationfor reconciliation between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people.

For the Unity-States of the America is with the treaty with the Kingdom of the Hawai' i:

U.S. TREATY WITH THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, DEC.20, 1849 The United States of America and His Majesty the King of the Hawaiian Islands, equally animated with the desire of maintaining the relations of good understanding which have hitherto so happily subsisted between theirrespective states, and consolidating the commercial intercourse between them, have agreed to enter into negotiations for the conclusion of a Treaty of Friendship.

Article I

There shall be perpetual peace a!nd amity between the United States and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, his heirs and his successors.

Article VIII

The contracting parties engage, in regard to the personal privileges, that the citizens of the United States of America shall enjoy in the dominion of His Majesty the King of the Hawaiian Islands, and the subjects of his said Majesty in the United States of America, that they shall have free and undoubted right to travel and to reside in the states of the two high contracting parties, subject to the same precaution a police which are practiced towards the subjects or citizens of the most favored nations. No arbitrary search of, or visit to, their houses, and no arbitrary examination or inspection whatever of the books, papers, or accounts of their trade, shall be made; but such measures shall be executed only in conformity with the legal sentence of a competent tribunal; and each of the two contracting parties engage that the citizens or subjects of the other residing in their respective States shall enjoy their property and personal security, in as full and ample manner of their own citizens or subjects, of the subjects or citizens of the most favored nation, but subject alway to the laws and statutes of the two countries restively.

Article XV

The present treaty shall be in force from the date of the exchange of the ratification for the term of ten years, and further, until the and of twelve months after either of the contracting parties all have given notice to the other of its intention to terminate the same, each of the said contracting parties reserving to itself the right of giving such notice at the end of the said term of ten years, or at any subsequent term. Any citizen or subject of either party infringing the articles of this treaty shall be held responsible for the same and the harmony and good correspondence between the two governments shall not be interrupted thereby, each party engaging in no way to protect the offender or sanction suchviolation.

For the violation of the 1849-Treaty of the Commerce, Friendship and Navigation is by the allowance of the domestic-law of the Unity-States of the America for the imposition within the territory and dominion of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i. For the Article of the VII of the 1849-Treaty of the Commerce, Friendship and Navigation with the Unity-States of the America is with the equivalent meaning with the Article: II of the treaty with the Great-Britain, with the Article: VIII of the treaty withthe Sweden and Norway, with the Article: IV of the treaty with the France, with the Article: IV of the treaty with the Belgium, with the Article:II of the treaty with the Netherlands, with the Article: III of the treaty with the Swiss-Confederation, with the Article: IV of the treaty with the Italy, with the Article: II of the treaty with the Russia, with the Article: IV of the treaty with the Spain, with the Article: II of the treaty with the Japan, and with the Article: II of the treaty with the Germany. For the occupation of the Islands of the Hawai' i is with the violation of the Hague-Conventions: IV and V of the year: 1907, Geneva-Conventions of the year: 1949, and Vienna-Convention of the law of the treaties of the year: 1969. For the Fourth-Geneva-Convention of the year: 1949 is for the courts ofthe occupier by the application of the laws of the country for the enforcement. For the Article: 67 is with the statement:

"The courts shall apply those provisions of law which were applicable prior to the offence, and which are in accordance with general principles of law, in particular the principle that the penalty shall be proportionate to the offence."

And:

"[The courts] shall take into consideration the fact that the accused is not a national of the Occupying Power."

For the Court of the State of Hawaii (s.i.c.) of the verb-fiction is with no autograph of the oath of the allegiance to the Government of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i with the accordance with the _______ and with the ______: 431 of the Civil-Code of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i, Compiled-Laws of the year: 1884 with the page: 105.

For the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States (1974) is with the codification of the obligations of the state for the elimination of the occupation of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i:

"[i]t is the . . . duty of all States, individually and collectively, to eliminate colonialism, apartheid, racial discrimination, neo-colonialism and all forms of foreign aggression, occupation and domination, and the economic and social consequences thereof."

For the John: Stevens as the representative of the Unity-States of the America is with the recognition of the status of the government as the de-facto:

A Provisional Government having been duly constituted in the place of the recent Government of Queen Liliukalani (sic), and said Provisional Government being in full possession of the Government buildings, the archives, and the treasury, and in control of the capital of the Hawaiian Islands, I hereby recognize said Provisional Government as the de facto Government of the Hawaiian Islands.

For the Queen: Lili`uokalani with the knowledge of the Law of the Nations is with the protest:

That I yield to the superior force of the U!nited States of America whose Minister Plenipotentiary, His Excellency John L. Stevens, has caused United States troops to be landed at Honolulu and declared that he would support the provisional government, Now to avoid any collision of armed force, and perhaps the loss of life, I do this under protest and impelled by said force yield my authority until such time as the Government of the United States shall, upon facts being presented to it, undo the action of its representatives and reinstate me in the authority which I claim as the Constitutional Sovereign of the Hawaiian Islands.

For the President of the Unity-States of the America: Grover: Clevelandis with the recognition of the coup as "an act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress." For the Grover: Cleveland is with the recognition that the "military occupation of Honolulu by the United States on the day mentioned was wholly without justification, either as an occupation by consent or as an occupation necessitated by dangers threatening American life and property." With the motivation by a "desire to aid [the Queen and her supporters] in the restoration of the status existing before the lawless landing of the United States forces at Honolulu," President:Cleveland is with the statement that "the past should be buried, and that the restored Government should reassume its authority as if its continuity had not been interrupted." For the President: Grover: Cleveland is with the elimination of the proposal of the treaty by the provisional-government in the year: 1893 with the language: \ldblquote The Government of the Hawaiian Islands hereby cedes . . . absolutely and without reserve to the United States forever all rights of sovereignty of whatsoever kind in and over the Hawaiian Islands and their dependencies; renouncing in favor of the United States every sovereign right of wh!ich as an independent nation it is now possessed; and hence forth said Hawaiian Islands and every island and key thereunto appertaining and each and every portion thereof shall become and be an integral part of the territory of the United States.

For the Senate of the Unity-States of the America is with no passage ofthe proposal for the treaty of the year: 1897 with the language:

The Republic of Hawaii hereby cedes absolutely and without reserve to the United States of America all rights of sovereignty of whatsoever kind in and over the Hawaiian Islands and their dependencies; and it is agreed that all territory of and appertaining to the Republic of Hawaii is hereby annexed to the United States of America under the name of the Territory of Hawaii.

For the Queen: Lili' uokalani of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is with the success of the protest of the Senate of the Unity States of the America:

I, Liliuokalani of Hawaii . . . do hereby protest against the ratification of a certain treaty, which, so I am informed, has been signed at Washington by Messrs. Hatch, Thurston, and Kinney, purporting to cede those Islands to the territory and dominion of the United States. I declare such a treaty to be an act of wrong toward native and part-native people of Hawaii, an invasion of the rights of the ruling chiefs, in violation of international rights both toward my people and toward friendly nations with whom they have made treaties, the perpetuation of the fraud whereby the constitutional government was overthrown, and, finally an act of gross injustice to me.. . . . . I, Liliuokalani of Hawaii, do hereby call upon the President of that nation, to whom alone I yielded my property and my authority, to withdraw said treaty (ceding said islands) from further consideration. I ask the honorable Senate of the United States to decline to ratify said treaty, and I implore the people of this great and good nation, from which my ancestors learned the Christian religion, to sustain their representatives in such acts of justice and equity as may be in accord with the principles of their fathers, and to the Almighty Ruler of the universe, to his who judgeth righteously, I commit my cause.

For the people of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is with thePetition-Against-Annexation with the autograph by the 21,269-subjects and residents for the "earnestly protest against the annexation of the said Hawaiian Islands to the said United States of America in any form or shape.

For the Hague-Convention: V of the year: 1907, Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land , with the Article 1: is with the statement: "The territory of neutral Powers is inviolable." For the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is with the condition of the neutrality. For the report for the year: 1999 of the Centennial of the First International Peace Conference for theUnity-Nations and for the Netherlands is with the advice for the applicability of the laws of the war and occupation by the Hague-Convention: IV of the year: 1907. For the Professor Greenwood is with the statements:

"a. the occupant acquired only temporary control overthe territory, not sovereignty, and was entitled, and required, to exercise the powers of government while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws already in force (Articles 42-3);b. the population of the occupied territory did not owe allegiance to the occupying power and could not be required to swear an oath (Articles 44-5), their lives, honour and property were to be respected (Articles 46-7); andc. the power of the occupant to take or use public and private propertyin the occupied territory were restricted by (Articles 48-56)."

For the state with the occupation of the state with the neutrality is with the obligation of the upholding of the laws of the occupied territory. For the term of the occupation by the state with the beligerence is with the temporariness. For the sovereignty of the domain is with thestate with the neutrality.

For the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is with the recognition as a State with its independence: November: 28: 1843. For the occupation of the Kingdom of the Hawai' I: August: 13: 1898 by the state with the beligerence is for the genocide of the Hawaiians and of the Catholics of the Guam and of the Philippines. For the beligerence against the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is against the Conventions of the Hague: 1899 and 1907. For the occupation by the Unity-States is with the imposition of its laws. For the Unity-States of the America is with the requirement for the vacate of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i by the international-law.For the Convention of the Vienna: 1969 is with the statement:

"There shall be taken into account, together with thecontext: a.any subsequent agreement between the parties regarding the interpretation of the treaty or the application of its provisions; b.any subsequent practice in the application of the treaty which establishes the agreement of the parties regarding its interpretation; c.any relevant rules of international law applicable in the relations between the parties."\pardIn the year: 1988 for the opinion of the Legal-Issues-Raised-by-the-Proposed-Presidential-Proclamation-to-Extend-the-Territorial-Sea is with theUnity-States of the Department of the Justice: Office of the Legal-Counsel: "it is . . . unclear which constitutional power Congress exercised when it acquired Hawaii by joint resolution."

With the opinion is with the quotation of a scholar of the constitution:

The constitutionality of the annexation of Hawaii, by a simple legislative act, was strenuously contested at the time both in Congress and by the press. The right to annex by treaty was not denied, but it was denied that this might be done by a simple legislative act. . . . Only by means of treaties, it was asserted, can the relations between States be governed, for a legislative act is necessarily without extraterritorial force -- confined in its operation to the territory of the State by whose legislature it is enacted.

In the year: 1996 for the opinion of the Validity of the Congressional-Executive-Agreements-that-Substantially-Modify-the-United-States' -Obligations-Under-an-Existing-Treaty with the Unity-States for the Department of the Justice: Office of the Legal-Counsel is with no legality of the attempt for the annexation of the islands of the Hawaii by the obligations of the treaties. With the opinion is for

the unilateral modification or repeal of a provision of a treaty by Act of Congress, although effective as a matter of domestic law, will not generally relieve the United States of the international legal obligations that it may have under that provision.

With the opinion is with the quotation of a Chief of the Justices of the Supreme-Court of the Unity-States of the America:

a judicial determination that an act of Congress is to prevail over a treaty does not relieve the Government of the United States of the obligations established by a treaty. The distinctionis often ignored between a rule of domestic law which is established by our legislative and judicial decisions and may be inconsistent with an existing Treaty, and the international obligation which a Treaty establishes. When this obligation is not performed a claim will inevitably be made to which the existence of merely domestic legislation does not constitute a defense and, if the claim seems to be well founded and other methods of settlement have not been availed of, the usual recourse is arbitrationin which international rules of action and obligations would be the subject of consideration.

In the year: 1993 for the Ka-Ho' okolokolonui-Kanaka-Maoli of the Tribunal of the nations is with the panel of the judges of the nations with the conclusion:

"Kanaka Maoli sovereignty has not been extinguished by the illegal actions of the United States . . . the Kanaka Maoli have been subjected to ongoing processes of genocide, both physical and cultural, at the hands of the U.S. government and the government of the State of Hawai' i."

For the government of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is with no interruption of the right of the sovereignty. For the government of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is with the reinstatement with the status as the proper claimant to the nationhood, and with the power for the naturalization of all residents of the Kingdom of the Hawai'i with the qualifications for the citizenship, with the Glen-Martin: Swartwout as the citizen. For the citizenship of the nation is with the allegiance of the citizen, for the ethnicity of the citizens of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i at the time of the overthrow and in the now are of the multitude of the world. For the website with the address of the www.lava.net/~hawngovt of the Office of Communications of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i with the phone: 808-732-3849 or the e-mail at the [email protected] is with the statement:

Identifying the POPULATION

Another law principle states that citizenship is based on allegiance, not race. Hawai'i is a land of many ethnicities. The pro tem government concluded that the offer to become a citizen would be extended not only to kanaka maoli, but also to Hawaiians (all persons born in Hawai'i not of aboriginal Hawaiian ancestry) and to foreigners (all those residents born elsewhere not of aboriginal Hawaiian ancestry).

For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout is with the knowledge as the witness of the government of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i on the island of the Oahu on March 13, 1999 of the session: 1 of the Legislature-pro-tem with the filling of all seats of the bicameral-parliament with the House of the Nobles and the House of the Representatives of the districts (24) for the reinstatement of the branch of the Legislature by the Constitution of the year of our Lord: 1887 and by the Law of the Nations. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout is with the testimony of the reinstatement of the government of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i as the witness of the fulfillment of the office of the Monarch of the Kingdom of Hawai'i by the vote of the legislature. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout is with the testimony of the government of the Kingdom of the Hawai'i as the witness of the fulfillment of the offices of the executives of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i with the appointment of the Minsters ofthe Foreign-Affairs, Interior, Treasury, Defense and Advocate-General. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout is with the testimony of the reinstatement of the government of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i as the witness of the fulfillment of the branch of the Judiciary with the appointment bythe King. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwo!ut is with the oath of the citizenship as the kanaka-\lquote e with the Kingdom of the Hawai' i. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout is with the status as the volunteer at the poll for the election of the Legislature of the de-jure of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i on the 6 of the November of the 1999. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout is with the testimony of the government of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i for the contribution to the fund for the publication of the writ of the proclamation in the newspaper. For the writ of the proclamation is with the forty of the nations by the mail. For the announcement for the record is by the publication of the Writ of the Proclamation:

WRIT OF PROCLAMATION KNOW ALL YE NATIONS, STATES, AND PERSONS : ON MARCH 13, 1999, A PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT DEDICATED TO THE REINSTATEMENT OF THE DE JURE' INHERENT SOVEREIGNTY OF HAWAI' I HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. DUE TO THE JANUARY 17TH, 1893 ACT OF WAR BY CONSPIRITORS WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE UNITED STATES MINISTER AND ARMED UNITED STATES MARINES, THE SOVEREIGN, INDEPENDENT KINGDOM OF HAWAI' I WAS UNLAWFULLY OVERTHROWN. EXERCISING THE PERFECT RIGHT TO PRESERVE HER NATION' S EXISTENCE IN PERPETUITY, QUEEN LILI' UOKALANI ISSUED A PROTEST LETTER AGAINST ALL ACTIONS DONE TO THE DE JURE' INHERENT SOVEREIGNTY OF HAWAI' I. SINCE THAT DAY, THE DE JURE' HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT AND SOVEREIGN NATION HAS REMAINED IN A STATE OF SUPPRESSION ANDIMPAIRMENT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE ABORIGINAL DESCENDENTS REINSTATE THELAWFUL HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIVERSAL LAWS, THE PRINCIPALS OF NATURAL LAW, AND THE LAW OF NATIONS. FURTHERMORE, IN 1993, THE CONGRESS AND PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES SIGNED A JOINT RESOLUTION (PUBLIC LAW 103-150, 107 STAT 1510) TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE OVERTHROW OF THE KINGDOM OF HAWAI' I, THAT STATES \ldblquoteTHE! INDIGENOUS HAWAIIAN PEOPLE NEVER DIRECTLY RELINQUISHED THEIR CLAIMSTO THEIR INHERENT SOVEREIGNTY AS A PEOPLE OR OVER THEIR NATIONAL LANDS TO THE UNITED STATES, EITHER THROUGH THEIR MONARCHY OR THROUGH A PLEBISCITE OR REFERENDUM\rdblquote . THEREFORE, THE TEMPORARY HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT ACCEPTS THE PERFECT OBLIGATION OF PUBLIC LAW 103-150, 107 STAT 1510, AND SHALL PROCEED TO EXERCISE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AFFAIRS OF NATIONHOOD. WHEREAS, IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS TEMPORARY HAWAIIAN GOVERNMENT TO ACQUIRE PERMANENT, DE JURE' RECOGNITION STATUS AND REJOIN THE COMMUNITY OF NATIONS, A FREE AND OPEN ELECTION FOR THE RESIDENTS OF HAWAI' I WILL OCCUR BEFORE DECEMBER 31, 1999. WE ARE EAGER TO CORRESPOND WITH THE GOVERNMENTS OF ALL NATIONS, AND BEGIN DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS.

For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout with the acceptance of the Application-of-Naturalization and with the oath of the allegiance to the Kingdom of the Hawai' i is as the citizen of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i. For the Preamble of the Amended-Hawaiian-Constitution-of-2000 is with the statement:

"Whereas the Kingdom of Hawai'i, having been in exilefor one-hundred seven years due to an unlawful overthrow of its government de jure, has exercised perfect right to reestablish its proper stationas an independent nation within the community of nations."

For the convening with the election of the legislature of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i for the first in the 107-years is of the 15th-day of the month: January in the year of our Lord: 2000 on the island of the Kaua'i. The legislators of the temporary government vacated their offices and witnessed the swearing-in of their elected successors. The objective of this convention was to retrieve the nation's constitution from suspension and update it for the twenty-first cent!ury. For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout with the knowledge is with the registration and the record as the voter for the ratification of the amendment of the constitution on the 29th of the April of the year of our Lord, 2000 in the Kingdom of the Hawai' i. For a letter of the protest is for the record at the International-Bureau of the Permanent-Court of the Arbitration at the Hague in the Netherlands:

PROTEST

In the name of the Hawaiian Kingdom and its Government, which the undersigned has the honor to represent, and in order to explain clearly for the information of all concerned; is issued, a Protest. WHEREAS, there was no annexation of our country, the Hawaiian Kingdom, or any of its territory by the United States of America as provided by international law and the acquisition of territories by means of discovery, accretion, cession, conquest, or prescription; and WHEREAS, our sovereignty as an Independent nation State has remained intact since its recognition by the Queen of England and the King of France on November 28, 1843, to the present, notwithstanding the fact that the Hawaiian government (body politic), being separate and distinct from the Nation State, lapsed into abeyance for over 100 years due tocircumstances associated with the unlawful incursion of our territory bythe United States of America; and WHEREAS, the unlawful incursion into Hawaiian territory bythe United States in 1898, absent a treaty of cession, occurred without the consent of the nationals of the Hawaiian Kingdom nor its Government; and WHEREAS, this incursion occurred in the territory of a Neutral State when the United States of America, as a Belligerent State, wasalready at war with Spain, and used our territory as a staging ground for conflicts in the Spanish territori!es of the Philippines and Guam, and divers world conflicts to date; WHEREAS, during the occupation of the Hawaiian Islands Article 43 of the Hague Regulations imposes the duty on the occupant to "take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country," and implies to the extent to which the law of the land, and particularly its private law, is not abrogated, but remains in force; and WHEREAS, the basic rule of wartime occupations stipulates that sovereignty of the territory does not pass to the occupying power, therefore the rights of occupancy cannot be co-extensive with those of sovereignty; and WHEREAS, according to international law it is immaterial whether the government established over an occupied territory be called a military or civil government, because its character is the same and the source of its authority is the same, which is a government imposed by force, and the legality of its acts is determined by the laws of war; and WHEREAS, it would then be within the rights of the nationals of the occupied nation to re-establish their government (in a temporary manner subject to the approval of the aggregate) within the confines ofHawaiian Kingdom domestic law and begin the exercising of those rights and the corresponding obligations and duties existing between the government and its nationals under the laws of occupation; and WHEREAS, the criminal proceedings of attempted theft of real property that were instituted against the undersigned, Mr. Donald A. Lewis, Mr. Michael Simafranca, and Mrs. Carol Simafranca under the laws ofthe United States of America, via the State of Hawai`i, have no basis infact or law, but rather is a political act by members of the government of the State of Hawai`i, and said proceedings stand in gross violation of! Article 43 of the Hague Convention IV of 1907, as well as Article VIII of the Hawaiian-American Treaty of 1849; and WHEREAS, on November 8, 1999, arbitral proceedings were instituted by a Hawaiian national, Mr. Lance Paul Larsen, against the Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom at the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, Netherlands; and WHEREAS, the Arbitral Tribunal is asked to determine, on the basis of the Hague Conventions IV and V of 18 October 1907, and the rules and principles of international law, whether the rights of the Claimant under international law as a Hawaiian subject are being violated, and if so, does he have any redress against the Respondent Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom; and WHEREAS, the undersigned is presently serving as Agent forthe Hawaiian Kingdom during arbitral proceedings and is registered with the Permanent Court of Arbitration together with 1st Deputy Agent Peter Umialiloa Sai, 2nd Deputy Agent Gary Victor Dubin, Esquire, and 3rd DeputyAgent Kau`i P. Goodhue; and WHEREAS, if the decision of the said Arbitral Tribunal shall determine that the Hawaiian Islands are presently being occupied by the United States of America, and the laws of occupation are instituted pursuant to the Hague Conventions IV and V of 1907, it will profoundly affect the present criminal proceedings and the persons responsible for the same. Now, therefore, be it known, that I solemnly Protest against every act and measure in the premises; and do Declare that from and after the date of said instituting of criminal proceedings until the decision of said Arbitral Tribunal, I hold Judge Sandra Simms and Deputy Attorney General Dwight Nadamoto, both being American nationals, answerable forany and every act, by which the undersigned, Mr. Donald A. Lewis, Mr. Michael Simafranca, and Mrs. Carol Simafranca, as Hawaiian subjects and residents of the Hawaiian Islands, shall be incarcerated in violation of their just rights and privileges secured under both Hawaiian Kingdom law and international law, or who may suffer inconvenience or losses, or be forced to exact monies to a government not their own. And I do hereby most solemnly Protest against the said Judge Sandra Simms and Deputy Attorney General Dwight Nadamoto, American nationals aforesaid, and all others whom it may concern, holding them responsible for their violation of the Hague Conventions IV and V, that was signed by their government, the United States of America, at The Hague October, 18, 1907, and duly ratified and deposited with the Netherlands Government November 27, 1909, should the said International Tribunal decide that under international law the Hawaiian Islands are presently being occupied by the United States of America pursuant to the said Hague ConventionsIV and V, 1907. Done at Honolulu, O`ahu, Hawaiian Islands, at the office of the Minister of Interior for the Government of the Hawaiian Kingdom,this 15th day of February, 2000.

For the Glen-Martin: Swartwout with the knowledge is at the court as the senior-court-barrister for the witness of the rape, apartheid and genocide of the people of the Kingdom of the Hawai' i by the State of Hawai' i (s.i.c.) and by the Courts of the State of Hawai' i . For the definition in the truth of the rape is with the copyclaim of the David-Wynn: Miller, Law-Procedures with the statement:

-RAPE

1.RAPE: FOR THE UNLAWFUL-KNOWLEDGE OF THE PARTY IS WITH THE USE OF THE FORCE AGAINST THE PARTY'S-WILL. FOR THE ACT AGAINST THE PARTIES-CONSENT IS FOR THE COMMISSION AGAINST THE PARTY'S-[RE]SISTANCE FOR THE OVERPOWERING BY THE FORCE OR FEAR OR WITH OTHER P!ROHIBITIVE-CONDITIONS.

2.FOR THE STRONGER-PARTY OF THE COMPELLING OF THE WEAKER-PARTY INTO THESUBMISSION IS WITH THE FORCE OR THREAT OF THE IMMINENT-DEATH, SERIOUS-BODY-DAMAGE, EXTREME-PAIN, OR KIDNAPPING ([RE]STRICTION OF THE PARTY'S-FREEDOM. FOR THE STRONGER-PARTY'S FICTION WITH THE SUBSTANTIAL-POWER IS FOR THE IMPAIRING OF THE WEAKER-PARTY'S-POWER, FOR THE APPRAISING/CONTROLLING OF THE WEAKER-PARTY'S-CONDUCT, BY ANY MEANS FOR THE CAUSE OF THE CLAIM OFTHE WEAKER-PARTY'S-[RE]SISTANCE. FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE WORDS IS BY THE DAVID-WYNN: MILLER, LAW-PROCEDURES.

3.FOR THE WEAKER-PARTY IN THE COURT IS WITH THE: "IN LAW" (VERB) "WITH COUNCIL"(VERB) FOR THE APPOINTMENT AGAINST THE WEAKER-PARTY'S-WILL IS FORTHE VIOLATION OF THE C.U.S.A.F.-CLAIMS WITH THE ARTICLE OF THE EIGHT(8);FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE DUE-PROCESS WITH THE C.U.S.A.F.-ARTICLE OF THE SEVEN(7) FOR THE CLAIM OF THE TRIAL BY THE JURY WITH THE C.U.S.A.F.-ARTICLE OF THE NINE(9); FOR THE LACK OF THE IMMUNITY WITH THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A=2E SECTION: 1605, BY THE FOREIGN-ENTITY WITH THE OATH OF THE CLAIM IN THE TRUTH AGAINST THE FICTION-LANGUAGE. FOR THE TREATY OF THE FOREIGN-SOVEREIGN-IMMUNITY-ACT IS WITH THE STATE OF THE FICTION-JURISDICTION FOR THE COMMERENCE WITH THE CHARTER-VESSEL-C.U.S.A.F.-CONTRACT OF THE SOVEREIGN-CITIZEN IN THE PARTY WITH A FICTION-STATES OF THE COURT-ENTITY WITH THE YELLOW-FRINGE-FLAG.

4.FOR THE COLLUSION OF THE FICTION-LANGUAGE IS WITH THE NOUN IN THE FICTION-USE AS THE VERB AND ADJECTIVE IN THE COURT. WITH THE TITLE: 28: U.S.A.-CLAIM: SECTION: 1359 FOR THE COURT WITH THE KNOWLEDGE IS WITH THE TRUTHFUL-LANGUAGE-PROCEDURES-JURISDICTION IN THIS CHARTER-VESSEL-CIVIL-ACTIONWITH THE PARTY BY THE JOINDER WITH THE TRUTH IN THE LANGUAGE-JURISDICTION OF THE SOVEREIGN-COURT THROUGH THE OATH IN THE TRUTH. FOR THE OATH WITHTHE CLAIM WITH THE TRUTH.

5.FOR THE TRUTH IN THE LANGUAGE IS WITH THE CORRECTION OF THE ALGEBRAIC-ENGLISH-FORMULA OF THE David-Wynn: Miller, LAW-PROCEDURES. FOR THE DICTIONARY'S-DEFINITION OF THE WORD "RAPE" IS WITH THE WRITING OF THE PAST, PRESENT-TENSE IN THE "PRE" OUTSIDE OF THE QUANTUM OF THE NOW-TIME-TENSE. FOR THE PRESUMPTION AND ASSUMPTION OF THE NOUNS IN THE USE AS THE ADJECTIVE OR VERB(FICTIONS) IS FOR THE IDEAS WITH THE CONFLICT WITH THE SINGLE-SUBJECT-MATTER-REQUIREMENTS OF THE RULES OF THE LANGUAGE. [STUDY-OLD-LATIN] FOR ALL LANGUAGES ARE WITH THE SAME-DEFINITIONS FOR THE TERMS OF THE PROCEDURES OF THE LANGUAGE. WITH THE COPYCLAIM: 7-21-2000 IS BY THE David-Wynn: Miller, Law-Procedures.

For the confidentiality of all information, books and records of the Remission-Foundation: Trust is by the contract in the truth with the Glen-Martin: Swartwout as the Grantor and as the Contractor. For the contract in the truth is with the clause:

For the confidentiality of the information of the Trust is with the responsibility of the Grantor and of all Contractors and Trustees.