:NDF:

Nanocolloidal Detox Factors is made from certified organic, raw, whole foods. components of 2 ml, two dropperfuls or 52 drops:

1. Nanocolloidal cell wall broken Chlorella pyrenoidosa 50 mg
2. Nanocolloidal Cilantro 0.12 ml
3. Nanocolloidal PolyFlor ™: complex ferments, cell wall lysates and enzymes from beneficial bacteria including:  Bacteriocins, hyaluronidase, naturally occurring vitamin B complex, superoxide dismutase, lipoic acid, fulvic acid, succinic acid, cell wall lipopolysaccharide-glycopeptide complexes, and whole peptydil glycans. PolyFlor™ micro-organisms include: 12 strains of Lactobacillus (including casei, acidophilus, salivarius, bulgaricus, sporogones and plantarum), 3 strains Bifidobacterium including longum and bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, B. subtilis, B. laterosporus, Saccaromyces boulardii, and saccaromyces cerveciae 10 mg
4. Pure water containing 75 mg/liter nanocolloidal Silica
5. Grain neutral spirits 20% as a preservative

NDF detoxifies by binding heavy metals.

Caution: Normally, this product requires only pure (distilled) water to be taken with it to assure urinary elimination. It is also recommended that liver support and drainage remedies be given for safety. See Liv.52 and Drainer #1 . It is highly recommended that this product be taken under the supervision of a health professional, especially for more serious conditions as protocols exist for different situations. Go to Healthy Detox  for more information.

This product can be taken by people with mercury amalgam fillings. Brush with 10 drops of NDF, rinse, and spit to get 100% of the precipitated methyl mercury caused by chewing out of the oral cavity after every meal and before every dose of NDF. After brushing and spitting, take the NDF down the back of the throat followed with a glass of water.
This product should be refrigerated once it has been opened or mixed with water.

Dosage: 6 drops twice daily in an 8 ounce glass of distilled or reverse osmosis water. The evening dose should not be taken at bedtime since you will need to void to eliminate metals.

Nanonization:

Chlorella is known in mining to bind heavy metals to its cell wall. Yet many people have taken Chlorella with no benefit. The reasons are that all of the available chlorella is not really 'cell wall broken' and that most of it is already contaminated with heavy metals.

In the past, Chlorella was only known to mobilize fecal excretion of metals. In NDF, because it is nanonized, it can cross the gut blood barrier and thus facilitate elimination via the urine.

After finding a source of chlorella that was not contaminated, the next challenge was that the cell wall is very hard to break. Enclosed are before and after micrographs of my processing of the best, currently available "Broken Cell Chlorella" taken at 400x on a DarkField microscope:

1. We mixed some of the chlorella with water and took a look. The picture clearly shows that not only are ALL of the cell walls intact, but the individual diatoms are tightly clustered in groups of about 500 units each. We estimate the cluster size to be about 30 microns. We would assume that this would be very difficult to digest and may explain why some people get gastrointestinal distress when taking normal chlorella but not with NDF. Nanocolloidal cell wall decimated chlorella has never been available so far! We were stunned to see that the best chlorella out there is not 'broken' cell wall.
2. We devised a nanonization process and ran the liquid through it. You can see the single free chlorella diatoms during the middle of the process and the beginning of cell wall destruction. Colloids of the cell walls can be seen in the surrounding liquid, the nanocolloids remaining invisible to the light microscope.
3. This micrograph is post centrifugation and reveals the colloids made from the chlorella during nanonization. You will notice that there is no particulate matter in micrograph A. Regrettably, our frame grabber is not quick enough to capture the exact detail of what can be through the microscope: millions of scintillating particles at .1 microns surrounded by a 'protit veil', or haze of smaller particles.

In addition to binding to heavy metals, Chlorella has other beneficial effects, augmented by putting it through this process, including: increased elimination of toxins, growth hormone regulation, a powerful nutritive impact and protection from radiation.

Mechanism:

The following is essential to the understanding of this supplement: The active ingredients are in a nanocolloidal form. A mathematician friend of mine calculated that there is at least a 500-fold increase in available surface area and a dramatically reduced particle size, thus rendering each ingredient more bioavailable and effective. That means the effective bioavailable dose is roughly one five hundredth of the dose required when compared to using a dose of the original ingredient. This is why 50 milligrams of nanonized chlorella achieves what 25 grams of normal chlorella cannot. (This fact was again demonstrated with atomic absoption spectroscopy during the research for "The Mitigation of Methyl Mercury Inhalation and Exhalation in Persons with Dental Amalgam Fillings" T. Ray, Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Nov. 2002)
Each of the ingredients can be delivered to tissue and intracellular areas that could not have been targeted by the same ingredients before. The supplement can be absorbed sublingually, via the skin, oral mucosa, or intestines. Most toxin-burdened people have compromised assimilation and utilization problems and cannot benefit from macromolecules.
NDF dislodges, binds to, and is used up by the first free radicals it encounters on its way into the body. If a person is currently exposed to chlorine, NDF will bind to the chlorine before it binds to the metals.

Cell Wall Broken Lactic Acid Bacteria

One of the reasons probiotics are so valuable is that they manufacture 'bacteriocins', a form of natural antibiotic that drives pathogenic bacteria and yeasts away from their territory without breaking their cell wall, called the 'competitive exclusion effect'. When you break the cell wall of Candida, which naturally absorbs heavy metals, those metals are released back into the system (possibly one explanation of Herxheimer's Reaction). Therefore, we included a solution of cell wall broken probiotics, including their bacteriocins, in NDF to drive out the pathogens without breaking their cell wall. So you have the advantage of correcting the dysbiosis, and because the probiotics are dead, you do not have the problem of them methylating the mercury. This is one of the reasons why NDF is generally so well tolerated. As the other ingredients in NDF reduce the presence of heavy metals and other free radicals in the system, the cell wall broken probiotic component is preparing the gut for recolonization. Depending on the case, therapeutic doses of probiotics can be given safely after the body burden has been significantly reduced.

PolyFlor™ also contains fulvic acid. This could be the underlying reason why healthy bowel flora is so vital to good health. However, just taking a flora supplement will not provide the same effect as NDF. Please see the literature on NDF-Plus for more information on fulvic acid, or go to www.fulvic.com .
Heavy metals, especially when amalgam fillings are present in the teeth, may lead to dysbiosis and candida. We believe that the complex ferments, bacteriocins, cell wall lysates and enzymes from beneficial bacteria prepare the intestinal terrain for the eventual restoration of the gut micro-ecology via the competitive exclusion effect, and that normal gut micro-ecology cannot be restored until the metals are gone.
Certain ferments and metabolites of PolyFlor™ (fulvic and hyaluronic acids) assist with penetration of the other active ingredients, bind with greater affinity to cell receptor sites than free radicals, dissolve solvents and paraffin (plaque), restore neurological function and promote a sense of well being. A person with a normal bowel flora will be better protected from environmental pollutants than a person with dysbiosis. Unfortunately, once the amalgams are put into the teeth, or the body burden becomes too great, or if a person only consumes processed and pesticide grown foods, these powerful allies no longer stand a chance of sharing their healing benefits with us.

Research:

"In conclusion, a pilot series of 11 pre and post urine tests show NDF is effective and worthy of larger study. These initial samples show all patient urines had an increase in heavy metals in post urines - particularly in the initial hours post ingestion. Urine collection method may be critical. Since the kidney filters the blood approximately 2.5 times per hour (Guyton et al., 2000), we hypothesize that NDF may not need the 60 blood passes per day to show chelation ability. Therefore, we collected one hour of pre chelation urine and compared it to an hour of urine collected hour 1-2 after an oral bolus dose of NDF. A wide range of heavy metals increased in the post samples." - James Schaller M.D.

Article:

The Mitigation of Methyl Mercury Vapor Inhalation and Exhalation in People with Dental Amalgam Fillings - Abridged
©2002 Timothy Ray OMD LAc

Abstract

It was found that NDF in the amount of 10 drops repeatedly and effectively bound 100% (dose related) of the mercury vapor precipitated by chewing, and did not cause the precipitation of additional mercury from amalgam fillings into the oral cavity, as measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Other substances tested did not perform effectively, and normal chlorella in equal amounts was 50 times less effective.

Study Premise

Is it possible to mitigate the inhalation of mercury vapor leaking from amalgam fillings (precipitated by chewing, drinking hot beverages, teeth grinding, dental procedures, substandard "soft" alloy preparations, galvanism) during pregnancy, while patients are waiting to get their amalgams replaced, during the procedure of having them replaced, or during general detoxification? For every breath they inhale, they also exhale (and or "outgas") into the workplace and the environment in which they live. This group, with amalgam fillings still present in the teeth, represents a huge population.

The following study was conducted using the Genesis Labs AAS (atomic absorption spectroscopy) Hg253 portable mercury vapor analyzer. An attempt was made to determine if the mercury vapor precipitated by chewing could be bound and then discarded (identified as a decrease in mercury levels after brushing and spitting) without causing an increase in the oral presence of mercury (identified as an increase in the mercury level after brushing and spitting).

Study Group:

The oral cavities of all persons in the study were measured with the Hg253 at rest, after chewing gum, and after brushing and rinsing with either 5 or 10 drops of NDF. Peak values are reported in milligrams per meter cubed (mg/m3). Measurements were taken through a tube placed in the center of the oral cavity while the lips were closed and the person breathed through the nose. The number and age of amalgams, and the presence or absence of gold fillings were recorded as a reference.

Age	NDF Dose in drops	# of amalgams	age of amalgams in years	Gold fillings	Resting S pH	Resting mg/m3	Post chewing mg/m3	Post wash mg/m3	% effective
35	10	6	22	0	6.3	<.001	.005	<.001	100%
50	10	6	37	0	6.5	.002	.005	.002	100%
32	10	10	16	0	7.4	.083	.131	.040	100%
64	10	6	30	2	7.1	<.001	.016	<.001	100%
47	10	5	32	0	6.4	<.001	.019	<.001	100%
28	10	12	12	0	6.4	<.001	.023	<.001	100%
38	10	11	30	0	7.3	<.001	.019	<.001	100%
42	10	2	30	1	6.0	<.001	.004	<.001	100%
32	5	10	16	0	-	.097	.131	.073	100%
32	5	7	8	0	-	<.001	.510	.170	66%*
22	5	5	10	0	-	<.001	.016	.002	87%**
32	5	10	16	0	-	.054	.084	.046	100%

* brushed for 30 seconds; also notice the massive release of mercury in this person with newer fillings.
** brushed for 3 minutes

Background: Safe Limits of Exposure

The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has established a threshold level value of 0.025 mg/m3 of mercury for an eight hour time period. The ACGIH additionally recommends that women of childbearing age should not be exposed to air concentrations of mercury greater than 0.010 mg/m3. Additional regulatory agency guidelines for mercury exposure levels are as follows. The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and the World Health Organization (WHO) have established an exposure limit of 0.050 mg/m3 for an eight-hour time period. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has established a ceiling (peak) exposure level of 0.100 mg/m3.

Organization	Threshold	Conversion	Time Frame	Notes
ACGIH	0.025 mg/m3	3 ppb	8 hours
MSHA, NIOSH, WHO	0.050 mg/m3	6 ppb	8 hours
OSHA	0.100 mg/m3	12.1 ppb	peak	Ceiling exposure limit
ACGIH	0.010 mg/m3	1.21 ppb	peak	Women of childbearing age

Reality Check

The primary route of mercury absorption into the body is through the inhalation of mercury vapor.

Genesis Laboratory Systems, Inc. 1005 North 12th Street Grand Junction, CO 81501. (970) 241-0889 (888) 270-0465 fax (970) 241-1239 [email protected]

Though we can measure exposure and excretion levels, we cannot yet measure cumulative body burden levels. Levels way below what is considered as "safe" devastate some patients, especially allergic ones. Others, reminiscent of the 90 year old who subsists on Big Macs or Fish & Chips, seem to at least temporarily tolerate higher levels. The bottom line for this author is that if the patient has a "complaint" or imbalance in conjunction with heavy metal exposure, addressing the heavy metals and chemicals first leads to greater and longer lasting clinical improvements than merely addressing the symptom.

Conclusions:

We managed to prove that we could get mercury vapor to go down the sink instead of down the throat or into the atmosphere, which is a definite improvement, but I have yet to hear about a plan for dealing with it after it goes down the sink or toilet and into the environment. Who pays the bill for that?

Full article published in Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, November 2002, #232