|
|
:Usury:
Spiritual prohibition against
usury is widespread:
-
Vedic India
-
Judaism (500
BC - 20th century)
-
Roman Catholicism
(12th century - 19th century)
-
Islam (570-632
AD - now).
Catholic-Eras:
-
500 to 1050.
The prohibitions are primarily applied to clerics. Usury itself
is poorly defined. ‘At no time was it said that usury was
a sin against justice, nor was restitution of usuries prescribed
as an obligation of justice. . . . while the taking of usury was
treated as a serious sin, it was denounced as a form of avarice
or uncharitableness.’
Noonan, John (1957), The Scholastic Analysis of
Usury . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
1050 to 1175. Usury is declared
a sin prohibited by the Old and New Testaments. All interest rates
greater than zero are considered usurious. Even the desire for
a return beyond the good itself is declared sinful. Usuries are
required to be restored in full before salvation is possible.
Higher prices for credit sales are declared implicit usury.
-
1175 to 1350. Usury becomes
a dominant concern for the Church. The peak of the ecclesiastical
attack on usury is reached at the Council of Lyon in 1274 and
the Council of Vienna in 1312. The punishments for usury include
the following: usurers are refused confession, absolution, and
Christian burial; the wills of usurers are declared invalid; rulers
and magistrates of states or communities which permit usury face
excommunication.
-
1350 to 1500. Professional
usurers are allowed to partake in Church services and to be buried
in Church graveyards. Numerous types of loan contracts are explicitly
declared non-usurious. The sin of usury is increasingly applied
only to excessive interest charges. In the late fifteenth century
the Church helps to bring into existence monti di pietà:
public pawnshops financed by charitable donations and run for
the benefit of the urban poor. Interest charges are explicitly
sanctioned in order to cover the cost of operation (6-15 percent).
-
1500 to 1600. In the sixteenth
century, ‘The Church reaffirmed its traditional doctrine
on the matter of usury and reverted to the uncompromising attitude
which had prevailed prior to the fifteenth century. The secular
authorities, however reluctantly, continued to issue licences,
but the Church henceforth refused to grant dispensation to the
Lombards [professional pawnbrokers]. They were, and remained,
excommunicated. According to Charles V's ordinance of January
30, 1546 (n.s.), licenced usurers were forbidden to attend mass
or to enter any church under the penalty of forfeiting their licences.
The same prohibition applied to anyone who was in partnership
with them . . . or who participated in their management.’
-
1600 to 1830: Usury prohibitions
are under constant theological attack within the Church. In 1830,
‘the Sacred Penitentiary issued instructions to confessors
not to disturb penitents who lend money at the legal rate of interest.’
De Roover, Raymond (1948),
Money, Banking and Credit in Mediaeval Bruges . Cambridge: Mediaeval
Academy of America.
1830
is the end to effective usury prohibitions by the Catholic Church,
as interest rates had fallen
to very low levels allowing a larger portion of the population to
qualify for consumption loans; new technology and increased investment
in agriculture resulted in increasing outputs with lower variance;
the state took on more of the responsibility for poor relief in the
form of poor law legislation; and innovations occurred in private
insurance that reduced risk.
Consumption
smoothing mechanisms in pre-industrial Europe:
-
borrowing from
manorial lords (e.g. in bad years rents could be reduced or forgiven);
-
borrowing internally
by consuming grain that normally would have been planted for next
year’s crop;
-
selling or
leasing land in bad years;
-
storing grain;
-
scattering
holdings;
-
pooling incomes
through Church fraternal organizations and informal practices;
-
receiving charity
directly and indirectly through the Church;
-
borrowing at
positive interest rates through the private capital market.
-
engaging in
illegal activities: stealing, urban food riots, peasant insurrections
Informal pooling and charity
were supported by Church doctrine which maintained that giving to
the poor directly was just as pleasing to God as giving indirectly
through the Church. The Church in the Middle Ages shared attributes
with the modern welfare state of the Church of Materialism. ‘Almshouses,
leper-houses . . . pilgrim centres . . . special provisions for
education . . . the establishing of monastic hospitals . . . are
signposts to a vast system of medieval poor-relief.’ In the
modern religion of materialism, the poor are often resented and
denigrated. Informal pooling is discouraged with substitution of
lending for charity, and the substitution of the capital market
for informal pooling. These modern substitutions both adversely
affect community-wide consumption smoothing.
Source
|