|
|
:Income:
Witnesses for the Truth of the
lack of the necessity with the Law for most Men and Women for the
Filing or Payment of an Income-Tax:
-
Joseph R. Banister,
C.P.A., former IRS-CID Special Agent
-
Clifton Beale,
CEP, A.S., B.S., MS-Taxation, Former IRS Revenue Agent and Appeals
Officer
-
Paul Chappell,
Attorney at Law, former U.S. Tax Court Clerk, IRS Chief Counsel
Attorney
-
Sherry P. Jackson,
C.P.A., C.F.E., former IRS Revenue Agent
-
John Turner,
E.A., former IRS Revenue Officer
Some core arguments against
the legality of the income tax:
-
Income tax
is voluntary. In Flora v. U.S. (1960), the Supreme Court announces,
"Our system of taxation is based upon voluntary assessment
and payment."
-
In Brushaber
v. Union Pacific (1916), the Supreme Court declares that "the
conclusion that the 16th Amendment provides for a hitherto unknown
power of taxation" is "erroneous," and thus the
16th Amendment did not give Congress any taxing powers it did
not already have. Hence, an unapportioned direct tax such as the
income tax still cannot be legally mandated.
-
The word "Income",
for the purposes of the tax code, can only be understood as defined
in the Codes and by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, in Merchant's
Loan and Trust Company v. Smietanka (1921), define it as having
the same meaning as in the Corporation Excise Tax of 1909. Irwin
Schiff writes, "nothing that was received by private persons
was taxable as 'income' under that Act." Income is defined
as "gain derived…from labor" in a previous Supreme
Court decision, Stratton's Independence v. Howbert (1913). Labor
is personal property, so no gain is made when exchanging labor
for money. When money is invested and earns a gain, there can
be income indirectly as a result of the original labor.
-
Tax statutes
in Title 26 of the U.S. Code are "void for vagueness"
because they lack precise definitions of such terms as state,
United States, employee, and person. The word "includes"
in the tax code means "specifically includes" or "includes
only", since anything not specified is not specifically included.
Assumption and presumption do not apply in the law.
-
According
to U.S. Code 26, Section 861, only income from foreigners or from
overseas activity is subject to income tax.
"Silence can be equated
with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak,
or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.
. . We cannot condone this shocking behavior by the IRS.
Our revenue system is based on the good faith of the taxpayer
and the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from the government
in its enforcement and collection activities." U.S. v.
Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299. See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021,1032;
Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932.
We-the-people: 537 Questions the
US Government Refuses to Answer: for Download
| :Matter: |
:Questions: |
:Issues: |
| Authority for any Liability |
49 |
Who has a legal obligation to pay the
tax? |
| Gift of the Labor |
83 |
Is labor something that can be taxed?
What constitutes "income"? |
| Jurisdiction |
43 |
Does the IRS have legal jurisdiction inside
the 50 states? |
| 5th-Amendment |
23 |
How can the government force you to waive
your Constitutional rights? |
| First-Amendment & Socialism
|
39 |
Do we live in a socialist democracy instead
of a constitutional republic? Does our government infringe
on our rights and freedoms and conflict with Christian religion? |
| 16th-Amendment |
109 |
Was the 16th Amendment properly and legally
ratified? |
| 4th-Amendment |
85 |
How can the IRS levy, search, or seize
assets without warrants or court involvement? |
| Closed-COURTS |
33 |
The courts work in complicity with DOJ/IRS
to deny due process. |
| Ambiguity of the LAW |
27 |
How can the Internal Revenue Code define
anything if the word of includes is not used restrictively and
if it doesn't define anything, how can we have a society of laws
rather than of men? |
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT,
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT & REGULATIONS |
40 |
Significant anomalies exist between the
"laws" and the procedures of the IRS. |
| Taxability of the SOURCES |
46 |
What "sources" of income are
subject to tax and count as taxable income? |
| INDIVIDUAL MASTER FILES (IMF)
|
17 |
Evidence of fraud and falsification of
taxpayer records by the IRS. |
| 26 U.S.C. 6020(b) SUBSTITUTE FOR
RETURNS |
31 |
Evidence that IRS agents have no authority
to create Substitute for Returns for Americans who are not "taxpayers"
or who do not voluntarily pay Subtitle A income taxes, which are
really not taxes, but "donations". |
| Citizenship |
85 |
Are you a "citizen of the United
States" or a "U.S. citizen" under federal statutes
and "acts of Congress"? Most Americans aren't,
and have also been filing the wrong tax form for years.
The IRS hasn't corrected this situation because they benefit too
much financially to correct it. |
| Original Questions |
561 |
|
| New Questions |
271 |
|
| Total Current Questions |
710 |
|
Two research reports demonstrate
without a shadow of doubt that the government has been acting ultra
vires (i.e., without bona fide authority), forcing ordinary Americans
to file and pay an un-apportioned, direct tax on their salaries, wages
and compensation, and that the government has known since 1916 that
it lacks the legal authority to do so, and that the government actors
have been negligent in their duty to stop and correct the wrongs.
Read the cover letter
to President Bush, et al.
Attachment
#1 is the compelling research report by Phil Hart, “Constitutional
Income, Do You Have Any?” showing that ordinary wages and salaries
cannot be considered “income” within its Constitutional
meaning, thereby rebutting any claim by the IRS or DOJ that the 16
th Amendment provides the legal authority to enforce the income tax
laws upon everyday working Americans. Summary.
Attachment
#2 is the comprehensive research compendium, “Analysis of
the Federal Income Tax Law.” This brilliant research report
was compiled by a credentialed tax professional who wishes to remain
anonymous, and proves the Treasury Department, the IRS and DOJ have
been ignoring the Supreme Court and congressional mandates since the
Brushaber decision in 1916, in order to perpetuate the “income”
tax fraud initiated in 1913. Summary.
Summary of Findings & Conclusions
of the
Citizens’ Truth-In-Taxation Hearing
Held in Washington DC, Feb 27-28, 2002.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Fifth Amendment
-
The Fifth Amendment
right against self-incrimination is absolute and unalienable.
-
There is no
5th Amendment “exception” for tax matters.
-
To avoid explicitly
ruling that citizens are, in fact, protected by the 5th Amendment
while filing tax returns, a federal Court of Appeals ruled, instead,
that the 5th Amendment does not apply to tax returns because the
5th Amendment only applies to compelled testimony. Ergo, filing
a tax return is not compelled, it is voluntary.
-
Using the threats
of criminal prosecution, financial penalties, and incarceration,
the government effectively forces citizens to “voluntarily”
waive their Fifth Amendment rights.
-
The IRS &
DOJ clearly uses tax return information to initiate and investigate
civil and criminal prosecutions against citizens.
-
The People
do not have to tolerate an income tax system in which the government
requires citizens to give up any Constitutional rights.
Bottom Line : If you file, you have waived your 5th Amendment
rights.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Sixteenth Amendment
The IRS cites the 16th Amendment
as its authority to force employers to withhold the income tax from
the paychecks of its employees and to force the People to file a
tax return and to pay the income tax.
? The Secretary of State in 1913, Philander Knox, in ignoring the
obvious, and well documented procedural and substantive defects
in the states’ legislative votes on the 16th Amendment, violated
the law and the Constitution by fraudulently certifying the amendment
to the U.S. Constitution.
? When asked to determine the question of the fraudulent adoption
of the 16th Amendment, a federal Court of Appeals said that was
a political question for Congress to decide.
? The original constitutional clause in Article 1 section 9 clause
4 REQUIRES that all direct taxes be apportioned. This clause has
never been repealed. The enforcement of laws based on the 16th Amendment
can NOT conflict with this clause.
? Our laws must be unambiguous to have legal validity. To tolerate
otherwise is to deprive the People of the due process protections
of the Constitution.
Bottom Line : The government claims its sole authority for the income
tax on the 16th Amendment. It was fraudulently ratified. All other
discussions are secondary.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Right to Labor
-
Labor is property.
It is the most valuable property to protect because through it
all other rights manifest in the People are realized and enjoyed.
-
Under the government’s
own accounting rules in the tax code as well as court decisions,
the sale or conversion of one’s personal labor into wages
or salaries as property does not result in any taxable income.
-
There is no
basis for payment of employment taxes on wages or salaries.
-
Income has
been defined by the Supreme Court as being a corporate tax on
profit.
-
The income
tax on labor in all respects, functions as a “slave tax”.
This is in direct violation the Constitution’s 13th Amendment
prohibiting peonage and involuntary servitude.
Bottom Line: The
wages and salaries of ordinary Americans cannot be taxed.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: IRS Violates Citizens' Due Process Rights
Due process is guaranteed by the
Constitution.
? IRS’s daily operating practices routinely deny the average
citizen due process of law.
? "U.S. Tax Court" is not a “real” legal court.
It is an administrative body of the IRS.
? The IRS administratively creates “dummy returns” without
legal authority as a first step in unlawfully “assessing”
and collecting income taxes.
? Even though explicitly provided for by U.S. law, certain IRS administrative
procedures are routinely denied to the typical citizen because the
IRS does not want to answer questions about the basis of their legal
authority.
? IRS denies due process procedures to rapidly push citizens into
the biased U.S. Tax “Court” where the price of securing
justice rises dramatically, and prohibitively.
? IRS routinely refuses to cite its legal authority or to answer detailed
legal questions about U.S tax law or the enforcement thereof.
Bottom Line: A tax system
that violates due process is, prima facie, unconstitutional.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Jurisdiction
-
The terminology
used in the Internal Revenue Code is deliberately misleading.
The average American who reads words such as “citizen”,
“taxpayer”, “state”, etc. in the tax code
without fully understanding the true legal definitions, will fail
to see that in fact, they are excluded, and are not subject to
the income tax laws of the U.S.
-
Legislative
jurisdiction is required to tax. The federal government enjoys
this Constitutional power in only a very small list of geographical
areas that include Washington DC. There is no legislative jurisdiction
inside the 50 states.
-
Jurisdiction
must be formally ceded by a state to the federal government. Without
this formal transmission, the federal government has no bona fide
legal jurisdiction within any state to legislate or enforce a
tax.
Bottom Line : The federal
government cannot tax your income within the fifty states because
they have NO legislative jurisdiction.
Conclusions & Findings of
Legal Fact : Liability
-
There is NO
U.S. income tax law or income tax regulation that explicitly imposes
the income tax on the general American populace.
-
The laws cited
by the IRS in compliance with the Privacy Act and the Paperwork
Reduction Act do not specify the specific legal authority that
imposes the income tax on the average citizen.
-
Key terms found
in the tax statutes and as used by the IRS such as “citizen”,
“individual”, “income” etc. are not defined
clearly in the law and as used in the law, even indicate on their
face that they do not apply to average Americans.
Bottom Line: As
the laws and regulations of the U.S. are currently written, the average
American is NOT liable for the income tax.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact : Fourth Amendment
-
The 4th Amendment
to the Constitution explicitly requires a signed court order or
warrant to seize property or conduct a search.
-
IRS blatantly
disregards the 4th Amendment in violation of the Constitution.
-
Employers are
deceived about their true legal responsibility by the misleading
content found on the IRS salary/wage “levy” form and
instructions.
-
3rd parties
such as banks, corporations, etc have no incentive to, and perhaps
fear IRS retaliation for, challenging Notices of Levy and Seizure
on their customers and/or employees.
Bottom Line : The 4th
Amendment does not matter to the IRS.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact : 26 USC 6020(b) Substitute Returns
-
The IRS has
NO legal authority to create a “substitute return”
for a citizen who chooses not file an individual income tax return.
-
Without a signed
tax return from a citizen, no individual income tax may be legally
“assessed” against a citizen by an IRS agent.
-
26 USC Section
6020(b) “Substitute Returns” is NOT applicable to
individual income taxes – only business related taxes.
-
IRS has propagated
the tax fraud by willfully utilizing deceptive training methods
and materials for their agents.
-
Although there
is no legal authority, IRS Agents are fraudulently trained by
the IRS to create “Substitute Returns” for individual
income taxes. Substitute Returns are used routinely in the normal
course of an agent’s workload.
-
IRS has put
their agents at significant legal risk, civilly and criminally,
for acting outside the scope of their delegated statutory authority.
-
U.S. Citizens
have been falsely convicted of tax “crimes” based
directly on assessment documents fraudulently certified by IRS
agents as lawful evidence of proper assessments and presented
to U.S. District Courts.
Bottom Line: ex-IRS
Agents have publicly sworn under oath about deceptive training practices
for IRS agents and have presented irrefutable documentation that they
have NO legal authority to assess an individual income tax unless
a return is first filed and signed by a citizen.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Individual Master Files
-
IMF records
are arguably kept non-decipherable to hide their abuse by IRS
agents.
-
The IRS unlawfully
alters its computer records by the improper use of computer code
fields to create and maintain records in ways that eventually
lead to unlawful tax enforcement actions by the agency. Conclusions
& Legal Findings of Fact: IRS FRAUD: CREATION OF TIME BARRED
ASSESSMENTS
-
IRS agents
unlawfully and fraudulently alter its computer files to facilitate
the illegal assessment and collection of taxes from the American
public.
-
There is proof
and sworn testimony of widespread and intentional illegal tax
assessments and accounting practices by agents of the United States
Internal Revenue Service.
-
The evidence
documents IRS fraud and abuse including: manipulation of taxpayers’
master files, illegal time-barred assessments, underpayment of
interest owed to taxpayers, illegal levies and liens against taxpayers’
social security benefits, illegal civil penalties, fraudulent
certifications of records and more.
-
IRS agents
are entering fraudulent transaction dates in some taxpayer’s
master files to cover-up and conceal illegal time barred assessments.
-
Prior to the
1998 IRS Reform and Restructuring Act, a taxpayer had no way to
prove that the IRS had committed illegal or fraudulent accounting
against them. IRS master files for each and every taxpayer were,
and continue to be written, in a complex, technical code. Any
illegal activity by the IRS could not be decoded. But the IRS
was forced to release the code as a result of the 1998 Reform
and Restructuring Act.
Bottom Line: IRS agents
are falsifying official records and committing other criminal acts.
Conclusions & Legal Findings of Fact : The Courts are
Closed
-
Even for crimes
where the punishment includes incarceration, tax defendants are
routinely denied the right to present defenses based on the Constitution.
-
The Courts
act in collusion with the Executive and the Legislative to perpetrate
the income tax fraud.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Word “Includes”
-
Critical legal
terms in the IRS code defy proper definition and interpretation
because of the IRS’s misuse of the word “includes”.
-
This deliberate
misuse of the word “includes” leads the masses to
falsely believe the IRS has jurisdiction over things, places and
People it does not.
-
This deliberately
induced confusion and ambiguity is an act of tyranny against the
People and a usurpation of power not authorized the IRS under
the Constitution.
Bottom Line : Without
well defined words, the laws are meaningless. This is a basic principle
of due process.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Taxable Sources
-
As written,
the statutes in the USC instruct tax payers to use regulation
Section 861 to determine if their income is taxable.
-
Deletions and
alterations of key phrases and references since 1954 have deliberately
induced confusion in this portion of the tax code which determines
what income is taxable.
-
Per the plain
language of the regulations, “Items” of income can
only be taxed if they come from taxable “sources.”
-
The list of
“sources”, which uses the same word “source”
as found in the 16th Amendment, is found in Section 861.
-
The list of
“sources” found at Section 861 is limited to foreign
source income and foreign taxpayers/corporations.
-
Per the plain
language of the regulations, wages, salaries and even capital
gains earned by ordinary Americans within the fifty states are
not taxable.
Bottom Line: The IRS
does not want you to look at Section 861.
Conclusions & Legal Findings
of Fact: Paperwork Reduction Act & Administrative Procedures
Act
-
Per the PRA,
all government Forms requiring information from the general public
must have an OMB number, be referenced in the regulations and
be approved by OMB.
-
Form 1040 has
never been approved as the proper form to file an individual “income
tax return.” In 1994, the reference to From 1040 was DELETED
from the table in the CFR that linked it to the income tax.
-
Form 2555,
“Foreign Earned Income” is the form specified in the
regulations as the form to collect the information described in
26 CFR 1.1-1 (the income tax section).
Bottom Line: Even
when required to comply with the laws of the U.S., the IRS refuses,
or can not , cite its legal authority for Form 1040 and implicitly,
the authority for the income tax itself. source
The Great IRS Hoax:
Why We Don't Owe Income Tax
This is a an amazing documentary
that exposes the lie that the IRS and our tyrannical government "servants"
have foisted upon us all these years:
"That we are liable for IRC Subtitle A income tax as American
Citizens living in the 50 states of the Union with income from within
the 50 states of the Union."
Through a detailed and very thorough legal analysis unrefuted by any
of the 100,000 people who have downloaded the book, including present
and former (after they learn the truth!) employees of the Treasury
and IRS, it reveals why Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code does
not require the average American to pay " tax " to the federal
government and why the IRS illegally enforces our revenue laws and
is therefore involved in criminal extortion on a massive scale.
This book might just as well be called The Emperor Who Had No Clothes
because of the massive and blatant government fraud that it exposes.
Three years of continuous research by the webmaster went into writing
this very significant and incredible book. This book is very different
from most other tax books because:
The book is written in part by our tens of thousands of readers and
growing... THAT'S YOU ! We invite and frequently receive good
new ideas and materials from legal researchers and ordinary people
like YOU, and when we get them, we add them to the book after we research
and verify them for ourselves to ensure their accuracy. Please
keep your excellent ideas coming, because this is a team effort, guys!
We use words right out of the government's own mouth, in most cases,
as evidence of most assertions we make . If the government calls
the research and processes found in this book frivolous , they would
have to call the Supreme Court, the Statutes at Large, the Treasury
Regulations (26 C.F.R.) and the U.S. Code frivolous, because everything
derives from these sources.
Ever since the first version was published back in Nov. 2000, we have
invited, and even begged , the government continually and repeatedly,
both on our website and in our book and in correspondence with the
IRS and the Senate Finance Committee ( click here to read our letter
to Senator Grassley under "Political Activism"), and in
the We The People Truth in Taxation Hearings to provide a signed affidavit
on government stationary along with supporting evidence that disproves
anything in this book . We have even promised to post the government's
rebuttal on our web site unedited because we are more interested in
the truth than in our own agenda. Yet, our criminal government
servants have consistently and steadfastly refused their
legal duty under the First Amendment Petition Clause to answer our
concerns and questions, thereby hiding from the truth and obstructing
justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. Chapter 73 . By their failure
to answer they have defaulted and admitted to the complete truthfulness
of this book. Silence constitutes acquiescence and agreement
in the legal field.
"Evidence of failure to deny statements of others is admissible
only when no other explanation is equally consistent with silence."
U.S. v. Gross, 276 F.2d 816 (1960).
If the "court of public opinion" really were a court, and
if the public really were fully educated about the law as it is the
purpose of this book to bring about, the IRS and our federal government
would have been convicted long ago of the following crimes by their
own treasonous words and actions thoroughly documented in this book:
Establishment of the U.S. government as a "religion" in
violation of First Amendment (see section 4.3.2 of this book and our
article entitled: The Government is a Pagan Cult and We've All Been
Drinking the Kool Aid )
Obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 73
Conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. 241
Extortion under 18 U.S.C. 872.
Wrongful actions of Revenue Officers under 26 U.S.C. 7214
Engaging in monetary transactions derived from unlawful activity under
18 U.S.C. 1957
Mailing threatening communications under 18 U.S.C. 876
False writings and fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1018
Taking of property without due process of law under 26 CFR 601.106(f)(1)
Unauthorized collection activity under 26 U.S.C. 7433
Fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1341
Continuing financial crimes enterprise (RICO) under 18 U.S.C. 225
Conflict of interest of federal judges under 28 U.S.C. 455
Treason under Article III , Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution
Breach of fiduciary duty in violation of 26 CFR 2635.101, Executive
order order 12731, and Public Law 96-303
Peonage and obstructing enforcement under Thirteenth Amendment
, 18 U.S.C. 1581 and 42 U.S.C. 1994
Bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §2113 ( in the case of fraudulent
notice of levies)
We keep the level of the writing to where a person of average intelligence
and no legal background can understand and substantiate the claims
we are making for himself.
We show you how and where to go to substantiate every claim we make
and we encourage you to check the facts for yourself so you will believe
what we say is absolutely accurate and truthful.
All inferences made are backed up by extensive legal research and
justification, and therefore tend to be more convincing and authoritative
and understandable than most other tax books. We assume up front
that you will question absolutely every assertion that we make because
we encourage you to do exactly that, so we try to defend every assertion
in advance by answering the most important questions that we think
will come up. We try to reach no unsubstantiated conclusions
whatsoever and we avoid the use of personal opinions or anecdotes
or misleading IRS publications. Instead, we always try to back
up our conclusions with evidence or an authoritative government source
such as a court cite or a regulation or statute or quotes from the
authors of the law themselves, and we verify every cite so we don't
destroy our credibility with irrelevant or erroneous data or conclusions.
Frequent corrections and feedback from our 100,000 readers (and growing)
also helps considerably to ensure continual improvements in the accuracy
and authority and credibility of the document.
Absolutely everything in the book is consistent with itself and we
try very hard not to put the reader into a state of "cognitive
dissonance", which is a favorite obfuscation technique of our
criminal government and legal profession. No part of this book
conflicts with any other part and there is complete "cognitive
unity". Every point made supports and enhances every other
point. If the book is truthful, then this must be the case.
A true statement cannot conflict with itself or it simply can't be
truthful.
With every point we make, we try to answer the question of "why"
things are the way they are so you can understand our reasoning.
We don't flood you with a bunch of rote facts to memorize without
explaining why they are important and how they fit in the big picture
so you can decide for yourself whether you think it is worth your
time to learn them. That way you can learn to think strategically,
like most lawyers do.
We practice exactly what we preach and what we put in the book is
based on lessons learned actually doing what is described. That
way you will believe what we say and see by our example that we are
very sincere about everything that we are telling you. Since
we aren't trying to sell you anything, then there can't be any other
agenda than to help you learn the truth and achieve personal freedom.
This is the ONLY tax book we have ever found that not only tells you
the complete story about government tax fraud, but more importantly
it shows you exactly and specifically , with both tools and detailed
procedures, all of the steps needed to free oneself completely and
legally from slavery to the Subtitle A federal personal income tax.
This is also the ONLY book that explains and compares all the major
theories and tax honesty groups and sifts the wheat from the chaff
to extract the "best of breed" approach from each advocate
which has the best foundation in law and can most easily be defended
in court.
The entire book, we believe, completely, truthfully, and convincingly
answers the following very important question:
"How can we interpret and explain federal tax law in a way that
makes it completely legal and Constitutional, both from the standpoint
of current law and from a historical perspective?"
If you don't have a lot of time to read EVERYTHING, we recommend reading
at least the following chapters in the order listed: 1, 4, 5, 8 (these
are mandatory). :source
for links, outline and free download.
See: wages.
|